IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
I think the Republic is worth the effort...
But wait, there's more....
GOP has sent out more subpoenas... Hunter's business partners looking
for more information on Burisma. Senator Chuck Grassley was on the
floor of the Senate talking about 17 recordings, 15 from Hunter 2 from
Joe Biden. Apparently the Burisma exec kept them as a backup if shit
hit the fan... Moreover, recently, the prosecutor that was
investigating Burisma... The one Joe Biden got fired.... the one that
Joe & Hunter Biden received $10,000,000.00 to get fired said he has
some documents that congress might want to see.
Joe all of a sudden had an emergency root canal yesterday....
The reason that I bring this up is that anything negative toward the
Biden Crime Family gets really-slow-tracked. Then there's the hurdle of prosecuting a sitting president. Even if they started something now, would it even get to the courts before he leaves office?
We already have plenty of evidence. The problem is action is very slow
to happen - if it happens at all.
The Elitists are experts at distraction.
The reason that I bring this up is that anything negative toward the
Biden Crime Family gets really-slow-tracked. Then there's the hurdle of
prosecuting a sitting president. Even if they started something now,
would it even get to the courts before he leaves office?
It is/was being slow-tracked. This whole thing has made the FBI, FBI now stands for Follow Biden's Instructions, look bad. Unlike the Democrats, the
GOP should have all their ducks in a row for the impeachment... BTW, GOP table
the impeachment of Biden and Harris yesterday... Stop it...
What they have RIGHT NOW... They have all the financial records for all those >fake/shell LLCs that were set up. Make sure that you can show the money trail
going from corrupt governments to the Biden Crime family. Show the evidence. GOP has started with the subpoenas... recently... last week... Hunter's ex-partners and other's that orbit around this situation that can offer a witness account and point to who the Big Guy is.... apparently in a 1023 the owner of Burisma refers to Joe Biden as the Big Guy.
And what not... Ones they have the financial ties... witnesses... other evidence... and a few videos of Hunter Banging $30,000.00 prostitutes... Then you go ahead with impeachment... GOP says they have enough now... I want the evidence to be overwhelming... even AOC would vote YES...
I saw a statistic on the TV... Legacy media put 100's of minutes into Trump an
"0" into the Biden Crime Family.
We already have plenty of evidence. The problem is action is very slow
to happen - if it happens at all.
They say they have enough... I want to see a perfect case against Biden that even the Democrats are outraged and we get the 67 votes in the senate to kick him out of office.
The Elitists are experts at distraction.I think we're cycling back to UFOs and aliens this week.
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
It is/was being slow-tracked. This whole thing has made the FBI, FBI
now stands for Follow Biden's Instructions, look bad. Unlike the Democrats, the GOP should have all their ducks in a row for the impeachment... BTW, GOP tabled the impeachment of Biden and Harris yesterday... Stop it...
I think we're cycling back to UFOs and aliens this week.
How is it being slow tracked? The Hillary investigation is long over.
Hillary Clinton was investigated by republicans a long time ago. No charges were ever files because there was no criminal intent.
They say they have enough... I want to see a perfect case against Biden even the Democrats are outraged and we get the 67 votes in the senate to him out of office.
Where is it?
Hillary Clinton was investigated by republicans a long time ago. No
charges were ever files because there was no criminal intent.
The permanent people of Washington see the elected people as temporary staff and deal with them accordingly. The Uni-Party run DC, not the Democrats or Republicans. When they wanted to find something on Trump it took months, not years. There was a case in Ocala Florida where a neighbor shot an other neighbor through a door... She was claiming Stand Your Ground... it took a few days for the investigators to come out and counter her claims... and arrest her.
If you are part of permanent Washington they won't investigate or charge you. FBI agents spoke out about the 10 million dollar corruption scandal and now the GOP are are trying to hold a corrupt system to account.
Nothing takes 10 years to investigate...
I'm not sure where you've been .... SO FAR what we know....
FBI whistle blowers notified congress about these 1023 forms that implicate the Bidens in a pay for play scheme. 5 million to Joe Briben and 5 million to Hunter, Hunter received his payment through being hired to sit of the board of Burisma.
This payment was made to get rid of a prosecutor who was investigating the company, there is video evidence of Joe bragging about withholding 1 Billion dollars from Ukraine if they don't fire him... And wholly shit... he was fired
FBI tried to hide evidence of 17 audio tapes, 15 of Hunter 2 from Joe, talking to the Burisma exec. They did this by redacting it from the 1023... GOP found out about it... FBI has given no reason as to why it was redacted.
Subpoenas have been issued out, last week, to talk to Burisma exec and Hunter' business partners.
This story is unraveling fast... permanent Washington might not be able to fix this one.
What 10 million dollar scandal?
What 10 million dollar scandal?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySqCxNMWDbY
Short clip... Put your head in the sand...
James Comer has nothing more than the Rudy Guiliani "Document".
There is nothing to it, there was never anything to it, there never will be anything to it.
James Comer has nothing more than the Rudy Guiliani "Document".
There is nothing to it, there was never anything to it, there never will
be anything to it.
I heard Rudy talking about it the other day... the 1023 did not come from Rudy...
but the story is unraveling quite quickly, Sticking your head in the
sand isn't going to make this go away.
Yes, the "document" was submitted by Rudy.
Be sure to let me know the outcome.
Yes, the "document" was submitted by Rudy.
No it wasn't ... FBI redacted the name of the person because they fear for the person's life... as per the FBI.
If the 1023 was from Rudy that would have released this information long
ago.
Be sure to let me know the outcome.
Sure will...
It was Rudy who submited this document to the FBI, as well as others.
If they go after Joe and his crime family I want it to be on a solid case with irrefutable evidence...
Bank records show that even his grandchildren received money from China and these LLCs
Bank records show that even his grandchildren received money from China these LLCs
What bank records?
Rudy made a lot of claims about proof of election interference. That all proved to be false.
The GOP's fealty to Donald Trump is a spectacle.
heThe reason that I bring this up is that anything negative toward the
Biden Crime Family gets really-slow-tracked. Then there's the hurdle of >> prosecuting a sitting president. Even if they started something now,
would it even get to the courts before he leaves office?
It is/was being slow-tracked. This whole thing has made the FBI, FBI now stands for Follow Biden's Instructions, look bad. Unlike the Democrats,
ablGOP should have all their ducks in a row for the impeachment... BTW, GOP
the impeachment of Biden and Harris yesterday... Stop it...
How is it being slow tracked? The Hillary investigation is long over.
Hillary Clinton was investigated by republicans a long time ago. No chargese
ever files because there was no criminal intent.
There is no evidence to support the "criminal Biden family" narrative. There
er was.
illionThis payment was made to get rid of a prosecutor who was investigating the company, there is video evidence of Joe bragging about withholding 1
dollars from Ukraine if they don't fire him... And wholly shit... he was fired
Yes he was. That was what they wanted. That was a success.
023...FBI tried to hide evidence of 17 audio tapes, 15 of Hunter 2 from Joe, talking to the Burisma exec. They did this by redacting it from the
edacted.GOP found out about it... FBI has given no reason as to why it was
The FBI has explianed it. There is nothing to it. Just nothing.
No it wasn't ... FBI redacted the name of the person because they fear for the person's life... as per the FBI.
Yes, that might be.
If the 1023 was from Rudy that would have released this information long ago.
It was Rudy who submited this document to the FBI, as well as others.
roveBank records show that even his grandchildren received money from China and these LLCs
What bank records?
Rudy made a lot of claims about proof of election interference. That all
to be false.
The GOP's fealty to Donald Trump is a spectacle.
The DOJ case against Hunter Biden (tax evasion and possession of a weapon by a
drug user) have been slow tracked for five or so years now.
I see where Joe mentions the Biden family. You are the one that brought up Hillary.
Yes he was. That was what they wanted. That was a success.
Quid pro quo, which is considred wrong if others try it.
023...FBI tried to hide evidence of 17 audio tapes, 15 of Hunter 2 from Joe,
talking to the Burisma exec. They did this by redacting it from the
edacted.GOP found out about it... FBI has given no reason as to why it was
The FBI has explianed it. There is nothing to it. Just nothing.
All the FBI have explained so far is that they cannot release the name of the source, or the contents of the 1023 but to only a select few, because it
will endanger someone's life.
So wait, the informat's name is withheld because the person's life might be in danger, but Al in British Columbia, Canada, knows it was Rudy Guliani?
How did you get clearance from the FBI to know who the informant is?
Sounds like you have breached their confidence, too.
The GOP's fealty to Donald Trump is a spectacle.
This is not about the election interference. This is about a politician
and his family receiving potentially illegal payments from a foreign
company.
What bank records?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQI7V4MkIxw
This current 1023 document has nothing to do with Rudy... PERIOD... if it was they'd say it to discredit the information.
WAKE UP
The FD-1023 information in question was determined to be unsubstatiated and that is why nothing has or will come of it.
I don't know the informants name.
I only know it was presented to the FBI by Rudy.
The FD-1023 information in question was determined to be unsubstatiated
and that is why nothing has or will come of it.
This is untrue...
Bill Barr, the AG of the time this 1023 was brought to his attention.
Sent the file to the federal prosecutor in Delaware so that it could be investigated.... And it was sloooooooooooooow walked.
TODAY the FBI & DOJ are on the hot seat for not even looking into things...
I put up a clip a day or so ago where senator Ted Cruz was asking the assistant director pointed questions on the matter.... and he refused to answer any questions.
They don't want to release his name. FBI says in doing so will get him killed
I only know it was presented to the FBI by Rudy.
Rudy was not part of the 1023.
Representative Comer said that the informant was a trusted credible
informant that has been used by the FBI for over 10 years, and was paid over 6 figures for his service.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elfkh2YFkl0
Rudy is NOT a trusted FBI source, never was and never will be.
Rudy happen to be pulling on the same thread.
For the love of all things good.... These facts are easily attainable on the Internet.
Timing is everything. Look at the timing of the Trump Indicement. Is
it just a coincidence that it came out just as evidence came out showing Biden took bribes as VP? Nope.
If the Biden evidence hadn't come out yet, then the Incidement would have happened closer to the election.
Hunter laptop comes out near the election and then it's "Russian misinformation". Only later do they admit that it's real.
The Elitists are using the justice system for their own ends. Investigations take as long as needed so that they happen on their timeline - in order to eliminate or smear their opponents.
IB Joe wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
Nothing takes 10 years to investigate...
Mike Powell wrote to ALAN IANSON <=-
That was not proven because much of the evidence was destroyed. All
that was proven was that they did not have enough left to build a case.
Timing is everything. Look at the timing of the Trump Indicement. Is it just
a coincidence that it came out just as evidence came out showing Biden took bribes as VP? Nope.
There is no evidence that Biden took bribes.
There is no evidence that Biden took bribes.
There is
There is no evidence that Biden took bribes.
There is
There is a lot of talk on fox news but there is no evidence that Joe
Biden took bribes.
There is a lot of talk on fox news but there is no evidence that Joe
Biden took bribes.
I don't listen to Fox News much.... I did hear a pod cast from Dan Bongino
tonight where he actually played the tapes involving Ukraine, Joe Biden and th
$10,000,000.00 bribe. I would copy over the link so you can hear it yourself but I know how you don't like to hear facts.
Accountant for Burisma recently found dead, this is the lady who cut the checks...
I hope we can pull out of this...
IB Joe wrote to Dr. What <=-
It'll only be time before it's all exposed.
Hello Joe,
There is no evidence that Biden took bribes.
There is
Lemme see if a got this right -
Joe Biden took bribes, Michelle Obama is transgender, her real
name being Mike, and not only that but Joe Biden has a body double
as the real one is dead (according to Rudy Giuliani).
There is no evidence that Biden took bribes.
There is
There is no evidence that Biden took bribes.
There is
There is a lot of talk on fox news but there is no evidence that Joe Biden took bribes.
Timing is everything. Look at the timing of the Trump Indicement. Is it
a coincidence that it came out just as evidence came out showing Biden to
bribes as VP? Nope.
There is no evidence that Biden took bribes.
Just none.
There is no evidence that Biden took bribes.
There is
There is a lot of talk on fox news but there is no evidence that Joe
Biden took bribes.
There is no evidence that Biden took bribes.
Just none.
When the evidence comes, your response will be met another that should make you think twice jumping into something you should of ignored.
There is a lot of talk on fox news but there is no evidence that Joe
Biden took bribes.
I wouldn't be looking to Fox News for this evidence due to that they at Fox News have gone woke and the situation is worsening,
but if this story is proven true, about Biden taking bribes then Biden is Toast.
The DOJ nor the FBI will not be able to help him.
I predict that they will not want to have anything to do with with the Big Guy
Hello Joe,
There is no evidence that Biden took bribes.
There is
Lemme see if a got this right -
Joe Biden took bribes, Michelle Obama is transgender, her real
name being Mike, and not only that but Joe Biden has a body double
as the real one is dead (according to Rudy Giuliani).
There is no evidence that Biden took bribes.
There is
Lemme see if a got this right -
Joe Biden took bribes, Michelle Obama is transgender, her real
name being Mike, and not only that but Joe Biden has a body double
as the real one is dead (according to Rudy Giuliani).
https://commonsensenation.net/sashas-and-malias-real-parents/
Here's an article on who Sasha & Malias real parent...
They should bring Maury Povich out of retirement.
When Trump was President impeachment hearings were started on the mere speculation there was something wrong with the phone call that President Trump had with the President of Ukraine, even though WE had the transcript of the conversation of every word that was indicated from start to finish within the transcript.There is no evidence that Biden took bribes.
Just none.
When the evidence comes, your response will be met another that should ma
you think twice jumping into something you should of ignored.
I am not ignoring anything. I am just saying that there is no evidence
of Biden taking bribes.
Do realize transgender women cannot give birth or suffer
miscarriages, as they were born men, and lack both ovaries
and uterus. And no, Malia and Sasha were not adopted.
In November 2018, after both she and Barack had left the White
House, she told us all about her experience with infertility.
Unable to conceive, she resorted to in vitro fertilisation (IVF)
to conceive Malia and Sasha.
This is what she has publicly admitted, on camera, to us all.
Imagine that. The most admired woman in the world, coming clean
about herself, telling us all who and what she was, and it was
such an unbelievable story that everybody accepted it as gospel
truth.
You have to understand. She grew up as a female, because that
is who she felt herself as being. As a result, her family and
friends only knew her as a girl. And then, as a woman. Never
as a boy or a man who later became transgender.
Barack Obama is a gay man.
The DOJ case against Hunter Biden (tax evasion and possession of a weapon by
drug user) have been slow tracked for five or so years now.
Nobody knows. The DOJ doesn't like to prosecute a sitting president, I wonder
Hunter is covered by that too. I don't know.
I see where Joe mentions the Biden family. You are the one that brought up Hillary.
Hillary is long off my radar.
So wait, the informat's name is withheld because the person's life might be in danger, but Al in British Columbia, Canada, knows it was Rudy Guliani?
I don't know the informants name.
How did you get clearance from the FBI to know who the informant is?
Sounds like you have breached their confidence, too.
I only know it was presented to the FBI by Rudy.
oThis is not about the election interference. This is about a politician and his family receiving potentially illegal payments from a foreign company.
Yes, it is. This is election intereference by the GOP. Who is bringing this
he table?
Mike Powell wrote to ALAN IANSON <=-
That was not proven because much of the evidence was destroyed. All that was proven was that they did not have enough left to build a case.
If anyone else had gotten wind of an investigation, then destroyed potential evidence, the judge would have taken that destruction as criminal intent and
admission of guilt.
aThis current 1023 document has nothing to do with Rudy... PERIOD... if it
they'd say it to discredit the information.
It is an unsubstanciated claim by who?
This current 1023 document has nothing to do with Rudy... PERIOD... if it was they'd say it to discredit the information.
There is no evidence that Biden took bribes.
Just none.
When the evidence comes, your response will be met another that should make you think twice jumping into something you should of ignored.
There is a lot of talk on fox news but there is no evidence that Joe
Biden took bribes.
llegalYes he was. That was what they wanted. That was a success.
Quid pro quo, which is considred wrong if others try it.
Quid pro quo is not always a bad thing, unless you are doing something
heThe Government of the USA wanted that prosecutor fired, and he was fired.
That administration got him fired by threatening to withhold money which,
others do it, is considered wrong.
Why is it the "Government of the USA's" business who is a prosecutor in another country?
I don't remember now. It was long ago. It wasn't just the USA that wanted the osecutor fired.
This is not something he should have done and he should be held to account.
It is what the US government wanted.
He keeps trying to twist it around to "about Hillary" or "about the
(2020) election" so that he can either ignore, or derail, the conversation... or he really is dumb.
Either way, I suspect that Ron's approach... don't even bother talking to him... is probably best. My only worry is that someone will read his nonsense, assume it is informed, and use it to form opinions.
I don't watch FOX news. The link I provided was not from FOX
news. It was congressional testimony without any editorial commentary. You chose not to watch it, so don't put your head in the sand then turn around and try to pass yourself off as having any knowledge of the
subject at hand.
When Trump was President impeachment hearings were started on the mere speculation there was something wrong with the phone call that President Trump had with the President of Ukraine, even though WE had the transcript
of the conversation of every word that was indicated from start to finish within the transcript.
Yet the Democrats still went for much more then impeachment hearings didn't that.
Grassley had called Monday for the FBI to release the unredacted version of the form, which he said mentioned 17 audio recordings of Biden and his son Hunter Biden accepting a bribe from an executive at Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian oil company.
FD-1023 is the form containing allegations someone made about Biden. Wray recently failed to comply with a congressional subpoena requesting all FD-1023.
It is strange to look online for information with this topic and I have seen multiple lefty news organizations can be plainly see that they are providing cover for the corrupt Joe Biden and his crackhead son Hunter Biden.
Why do you think that is Alan. Could it be that these organizations are in Bed with the Democratic Party?
When Trump was facing questions even long before the impeachment hearings the same media was nearly screaming off with his head.
Remember the squad member Rashida Tlaib We're gunna impeach the Mother F'er.
I only know it was presented to the FBI by Rudy.
You are still on the wrong case.
And yet the Russian collusion hoax, which was perpetuated by the Democrats, was not election interference? Who brought that to the table?
As you have previously shown at least some knowledge of what a 1023 is, you know it didn't "come from Rudy."
He keeps trying to twist it around to "about Hillary" or "about the (2020) election" so that he can either ignore, or derail, the conversation... or
he really is dumb.
When the evidence comes, your response will be met another that should make >> you think twice jumping into something you should of ignored.
He will still be living in his bubble, either claiming there is no evidence or trying to divert the conversation to Hillary or 2020 or something else.
I don't watch FOX news. The link I provided was not from FOX
news. It was congressional testimony without any editorial commentary.
You chose not to watch it, so don't put your head in the sand then turn around and try to pass yourself off as having any knowledge of the subject
at hand.
The correct answer is that they don't, yet Biden has admitted (in order to impress upon people that he had power as VP) to threatening to withhold promised funds until the deed was done.
This is not something he should have done and he should be held to account.
It is what the US government wanted.
That does not make it right.
On 06-19-23 09:01, Mike Powell <=-
spoke to Ib Joe about Re: Bringing a knife to a <=-
Either way, I suspect that Ron's approach... don't even bother talking
to him... is probably best. My only worry is that someone will read
his nonsense, assume it is informed, and use it to form opinions.
um WE have the transcript of the conversation, it shows every word spoken.When Trump was President impeachment hearings were started on the mere speculation there was something wrong with the phone call that President Trump had with the President of Ukraine, even though WE had the transcrip
of the conversation of every word that was indicated from start to finish
within the transcript.
It was not mere speculation.
How is anyone providing cover for the Bidens?Open your eyes when your on the internet looking facts on these issues, start off with google or perhaps use bing.com you can see the left leaning websites and what can be viewed without any effort as Liberal Bias.
Mike Powell wrote to Dr. What <=-
If anyone else had gotten wind of an investigation, then destroyed potential evidence, the judge would have taken that destruction as criminal intent and admission of guilt.
Exactly. I guess that is not the case in Canada, or is not the case if you're not orange.
Maybe we could sell Alan a ticket on Biden's Indian Ocean railroad?
um WE have the transcript of the conversation, it shows every word spoken. The problem here was not what was spoken within this conversation on the telephone, nor was there any difficulty w/ the ability to read the typed text. The problem here was perception and comprehension thinking that what was something was said that was a quid pro quo, but it wasn't after he was acquitted and the impeachment was an epic failure.
It's rather interesting that Trump was more right then he realized we are about to find out how corrupt the Bidens were.
It has already been uncovered the dirty Biden money was being funneled in to hundreds of LCC in attempt to hide it.
Can you imagine if Trump did any of this?
How is anyone providing cover for the Bidens?Open your eyes when your on the internet looking facts on these issues, start off with google or perhaps use bing.com you can see the left leaning websites and what can be viewed without any effort as Liberal Bias.
As they suggest there is nothing to see. It is disgusting.
That is what mean by providing cover, as if I had to give you this explanation.
According to IB Joe the recordings exist but I have not heard them.
According to IB Joe the recordings exist but I have not heard them.
IB gave you a link where Dan Bongino played the Biden tapes, 2 of them, on his pod cast and you chose not to listen to them.
I went to have a look at the video in your link.
Bongino wasn't getting to anything at all, so I left.
Here's Dan's view on what the left is trying to hide
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkZhTy6kgHE&list=WL&index=1&t=236s
Here's Dan's view on what the left is trying to hide
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkZhTy6kgHE&list=WL&index=1&t=236s
BTW, who is Hunter Biden?
Is he president?
Is he vice president?
Is he a congressman?
Is he a senator?
Is he a mayor?
Who is this Hunter Biden you keep talking about?
U didn't look at the video did you??
BTW, Hunter is the lead man selling political favors for the Biden crime family.
Ah, so Hunter is Mr. Big?
When the evidence comes, your response will be met another that should
make you think twice jumping into something you should of ignored.
He will still be living in his bubble, either claiming there is no evidence
or trying to divert the conversation to Hillary or 2020 or something else.
It is not evidence. It was election iterference then and it is election interference today.
He keeps trying to twist it around to "about Hillary" or "about the (2020)
election" so that he can either ignore, or derail, the conversation... or
he really is dumb.
That is not so. You are the one talking about Hillary.
You mentioned her yet again today.
I only know it was presented to the FBI by Rudy.
You are still on the wrong case.
No, this all stems from the same Barisma nonsense.
And yet the Russian collusion hoax, which was perpetuated by the Democrats,
was not election interference? Who brought that to the table?
Russian collusion is/was not a hoax.
The president and his vice president work toward the goals of the US gov't,
no?
Either way, I suspect that Ron's approach... don't even bother talking
to him... is probably best. My only worry is that someone will read
his nonsense, assume it is informed, and use it to form opinions.
You are stating an opinion that I formed a long time ago -- probably before he dropped his last name from his postings.
I don't watch FOX news. The link I provided was not from FOX
news. It was congressional testimony without any editorial commentary. You chose not to watch it, so don't put your head in the sand then turn around and try to pass yourself off as having any knowledge of the subject at hand.
Ron doesn't like facts...
Russian collusion is/was not a hoax.
etAs you have previously shown at least some knowledge of what a 1023 is, you know it didn't "come from Rudy."
It did come from Rudy but I don't think Rudy's involvement is an important
l, or is it?
An FD-1023 is not evidence of a crime. It is a claim someone made.
The FBI did look at it but the claims are unsubstantiated.
Either way, I suspect that Ron's approach... don't even bother talking to him... is probably best. My only worry is that someone will read
his nonsense, assume it is informed, and use it to form opinions.
You are stating an opinion that I formed a long time ago -- probably
before he dropped his last name from his postings.
According to IB Joe the recordings exist but I have not heard them.
IB gave you a link where Dan Bongino played the Biden tapes, 2 of them, onis
od cast and you chose not to listen to them.
Like I said there lies the issue with Perception and the Comprehension of the transcript - an actual word for word account of what was said on the phone call. What happened, clearly is that seething hating Democrats thought they heard something but that was proven false with Trump being acquitted.um WE have the transcript of the conversation, it shows every word spoken
The problem here was not what was spoken within this conversation on the telephone, nor was there any difficulty w/ the ability to read the typed text. The problem here was perception and comprehension thinking that wha
was something was said that was a quid pro quo, but it wasn't after he wa
acquitted and the impeachment was an epic failure.
Trump (even then) wanted dirt on his political opponent, Joe Biden.
Trump was an awesome President and I have those facts too and believe you me they would render you speechless if I list all that was accomplished under the Trump years.It's rather interesting that Trump was more right then he realized we are
about to find out how corrupt the Bidens were.
Trump has been right about very little.
No evidence? What do call all this money in these hundreds of LCC accounts that was discovered. That was not put there by the guy on Lucky Charms cereal box. You know what will be "magically delicious" when the truth is known and then. You loose your ENTIRE basis of your arguement / debate, as IT will render you pointless and a joke.There is no evidence of the Bidens corruption. None.
It has already been uncovered the dirty Biden money was being funneled in AI> > hundreds of LCC in attempt to hide it.
AI> There is no evidence. None. AI>
You say "the left" is providing cover for the Bidens. That is not so. If there is proof the Bidens did anything wrong the left just asks to seeOh yeah tell me why is the FBI so lipped about FD-1023?
the evidence.
Russian collusion is/was not a hoax.
Says the man who very recently claimed he NEVER claimed in this echo that Russian collusion was real?
An FD-1023 is not evidence of a crime. It is a claim someone made.
It is a claim made by an unknown source. Rudy is known and is therefore
not unknown. Rudy does not work for the FBI so he did not provide the FD-1023 (an official FBI document) or conduct any interview that resulted in said FD-1023.
The FBI did look at it but the claims are unsubstantiated.
The FBI has only claimed that no one can look at it because it will
endanger the life of the unknown informant, who presumably needs protection from someone implicated in the matter.
The only persons I know who are implicated are named Biden.
On 06-20-23 15:42, Mike Powell <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Bringing a knife to <=-
Either way, I suspect that Ron's approach... don't even bother talking to him... is probably best. My only worry is that someone will read his nonsense, assume it is informed, and use it to form opinions.
You are stating an opinion that I formed a long time ago -- probably
before he dropped his last name from his postings.
Alan Ianson has not dropped his last name in this echo, although he
has in others.
You say "the left" is providing cover for the Bidens. That is not so. IfOh yeah tell me why is the FBI so lipped about FD-1023?
there is proof the Bidens did anything wrong the left just asks to see
the evidence.
That should tell you everything that you need to know.
Ron doesn't like facts...
I think you mean Al. :)
If he doesn't listen, they are not true.
I think you mean Al. :)
There are a couple of people here that don 't like facts... Al is one of them...
Of course the FBI looked at it. The FBI doesn't stop looking at (good)nforma
on because someone is in danger.
alkingEither way, I suspect that Ron's approach... don't even bother
to him... is probably best. My only worry is that someone will read his nonsense, assume it is informed, and use it to form opinions.
You are stating an opinion that I formed a long time ago -- probably before he dropped his last name from his postings.
Alan Ianson has not dropped his last name in this echo, although he
has in others.
I was talking about Ron, not Alan.
Trump (even then) wanted dirt on his political opponent, Joe Biden.
The FD-1023 is not evidence.
The FBI did not look into CIA information during 2016 that suggested that a certain (D) Presidential campaign was planning to misinform the public by spreading a rumor that their (R) opponent's campaign was working with Russia.
Trump (even then) wanted dirt on his political opponent, Joe Biden.
Trump wanted dirt on his political opponent.
Biden wanted to get rid of a foreign political opponent who was hassling
the company his son worked for.
The FD-1023 is not evidence.
The testimony recorded on it is.
On 06-21-23 15:48, Mike Powell <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Bringing a knife to <=-
MP> alkingEither way, I suspect that Ron's approach... don't even bother
to him... is probably best. My only worry is that someone will read his nonsense, assume it is informed, and use it to form opinions.
You are stating an opinion that I formed a long time ago -- probably before he dropped his last name from his postings.
Alan Ianson has not dropped his last name in this echo, although he
has in others.
I was talking about Ron, not Alan.
Why would Ron's approach that is probably best be not talking to
himself?
yeah they did but only after a threat from Joe Biden that they wouldn't get the Billion Dollars, but why? The prosecutor was investigating Burisma Gas Corporation, that his son Hunter was on the board of.Trump (even then) wanted dirt on his political opponent, Joe Biden.
Trump wanted dirt on his political opponent.
Yes.
Biden wanted to get rid of a foreign political opponent who was hassling the company his son worked for.
It was Ukraine who fired that corrupt prosecutor.
It was Ukraine who fired that corrupt prosecutor.yeah they did but only after a threat from Joe Biden that they wouldn't get th
Billion Dollars, but why? The prosecutor was investigating Burisma Gas Corporation, that his son Hunter was on the board of.
(You left that small important detail out)
Russian collusion is/was not a hoax.
Says the man who very recently claimed he NEVER claimed in this echo that Russian collusion was real?
"exonerate(s) Donald Trump" = his campaign did not collude with the Russians. Therefore, Russian collusion with the 2016 Trump campaign is a hoax perpetuated by the sore losers on the other side.
As you have previously shown at least some knowledge of what a 1023 is,you
know it didn't "come from Rudy."
It did come from Rudy but I don't think Rudy's involvement is an importantet
l, or is it?
An FD-1023 is not evidence of a crime. It is a claim someone made.
It is a claim made by an unknown source.
The FBI did not look into CIA information during 2016 that suggested that a
certain (D) Presidential campaign was planning to misinform the public by
spreading a rumor that their (R) opponent's campaign was working with
Russia.
I just don't believe your narrative.
The FD-1023 is not evidence.
The testimony recorded on it is.
Trump (even then) wanted dirt on his political opponent, Joe Biden.
Trump wanted dirt on his political opponent.
Alan Ianson has not dropped his last name in this echo, although he
has in others.
I was talking about Ron, not Alan.
Why would Ron's approach that is probably best be not talking to himself?
The FBI did not look into CIA information during 2016 that suggested that a
certain (D) Presidential campaign was planning to misinform the public by spreading a rumor that their (R) opponent's campaign was working with Russia.
heAlan Ianson has not dropped his last name in this echo, although
has in others.
I was talking about Ron, not Alan.
Why would Ron's approach that is probably best be not talking to
himself?
I read that as "don't even bother talking to him" meaning talking to
Ron. He rarely responds, and even if he does it is not responsive.
ussiaThe FBI did not look into CIA information during 2016 that suggested that a certain (D) Presidential campaign was planning to misinform the public by spreading a rumor that their (R) opponent's campaign was working with
I just don't believe your narrative.
Biden wanted to get rid of a foreign political opponent who was hassling the company his son worked for.
It was Ukraine who fired that corrupt prosecutor.
I read that as "don't even bother talking to him" meaning talking to
Ron. He rarely responds, and even if he does it is not responsive.
hIt was Ukraine who fired that corrupt prosecutor.yeah they did but only after a threat from Joe Biden that they wouldn't get
Billion Dollars, but why? The prosecutor was investigating Burisma Gasorpora
on, that his son Hunter was on the board of.
(You left that small important detail out)
Biden wanted to get rid of a foreign political opponent who was hassling >> > the company his son worked for.
It was Ukraine who fired that corrupt prosecutor.
Because they were told, by VP Biden, that they'd not get the promised money unless they did him a favor first. Because Obama also wanted that favor doesn't make any difference.
He undoubtedly believes that is only a coincidence. <rollseyes>
Mike Powell wrote to DALE SHIPP <=-
I read that as "don't even bother talking to him" meaning talking to
Ron. He rarely responds, and even if he does it is not responsive.
He usually responds to me, even if we don't always agree.
I don't respond to Dale because he has nothing worth reading.
| Sysop: | Xerxes |
|---|---|
| Location: | Azle, Texas |
| Users: | 119 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 144:42:51 |
| Calls: | 3,030 |
| Calls today: | 6 |
| Files: | 156 |
| U/L today: |
0 files (0K bytes) |
| D/L today: |
0 files (0K bytes) |
| Messages: | 294,246 |
| Posted today: | 0 |