I contacted Claudia Tenney's office about Biden's water pipe scam. I was surprised to get a phone call for a reply! A rep for Rep Tenney said:
"The project is not yet complete, but we still expect to see all of the state's lead pipes replaced."
These were NY state rules, not federal rules. I doubt that Biden's plan directly funds cities; it's far more likely that states receive grants from the federal government, which they then disperse downwards to counties and cities. The federal government may or may not have any say
in how the states prioritize funding.
These were NY state rules, not federal rules. I doubt that Biden's pl directly funds cities; it's far more likely that states receive grant from the federal government, which they then disperse downwards to counties and cities. The federal government may or may not have any s in how the states prioritize funding.There was already a state plan in place to replace the lines, but I want you to understand the concept of paying for one thing at a time; receive delivery for 1st invoice (Bipartisan InfrastructureA Act) before paying for 2nd invoice (Inflation Reduction Act.)
Now we're waiting for delivery of all kinds of stuff, not just lead
pipes, but where's our earth cooling machine? Where's our inflation reduction? I don't see any "inflation-related price increases" coming
back down. Yet all this stuff is paid for in full by the taxpayers (and
by future generations.)
We can fund more than one thing at a time. I often pay my water, gas, and electric bills on the same day, and paying just one of them won't keep
the other services from being cut off for non-payment. Each bill pays
for a different service. But I'm sure you understand how that works.
We can fund more than one thing at a time. I often pay my water, gas, and electric bills on the same day, and paying just one of them won't keep the other services from being cut off for non-payment. Each bill pays for a different service. But I'm sure you understand how that works.
The idea of only paying for one thing at a time may be what your are trying to get me to understand, but it is an artificial restriction placed on the government by Aaron Thomas, not by any law, convention, or statute. It exists only in your mind.
We can fund more than one thing at a time. I often pay my water, gas, electric bills on the same day, and paying just one of them won't kee the other services from being cut off for non-payment. Each bill pays for a different service. But I'm sure you understand how that works.Funding 2 things at the same time can be ok, but these 2 money-grabs
were not funded at the same time.
The power company doesn't force people to pre-pay for September, leave them without power for the whole month of September, and then force them to pre-pay for October. It don't work that way.
We can fund more than one thing at a time. I often pay my water, gas, an electric bills on the same day, and paying just one of them won't keep t other services from being cut off for non-payment. Each bill pays for a different service. But I'm sure you understand how that works.But you also cannot spend money you don't have, right? So, if you have those multiple bills, but don't have the money to pay them all, you pay what you can and then theoretically the others get cut off.
The idea of only paying for one thing at a time may be what your are try to get me to understand, but it is an artificial restriction placed on t government by Aaron Thomas, not by any law, convention, or statute. It e only in your mind.
The government does not have that restriction. They just print more money, which is bad economics in the long run, to cover their
exponential debt.
The government does not have that restriction. They just print more money, which is bad economics in the long run, to cover their exponential debt.
They don't necessarily print more money, but that is an option that they have. Trump seemed exceptionally keen on using it.
As has Biden. I don't think it is a great policy from either of them.The government does not have that restriction. They just print mor money, which is bad economics in the long run, to cover their exponential debt.They don't necessarily print more money, but that is an option that they have. Trump seemed exceptionally keen on using it.
But you also cannot spend money you don't have, right? So, if you have those multiple bills, but don't have the money to pay them all, you pay what you can and then theoretically the others get cut off.
The government does not have that restriction.
They just print more money, which is bad economics in the long run, to cover
their exponential debt.
But you also cannot spend money you don't have, right? So, if you have
those multiple bills, but don't have the money to pay them all, you pay
what you can and then theoretically the others get cut off.
True, and I don't go into debt to pay monthly bills. I have gone into debt to
fund other purchases and have several times carried car and house loans at the same time.
The government does not have that restriction. They just print more
money, which is bad economics in the long run, to cover their
exponential debt.
They don't necessarily print more money, but that is an option that they have. Trump seemed exceptionally keen on using it.
| Sysop: | Xerxes |
|---|---|
| Location: | Azle, Texas |
| Users: | 119 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 147:36:49 |
| Calls: | 3,032 |
| Calls today: | 8 |
| Files: | 156 |
| U/L today: |
0 files (0K bytes) |
| D/L today: |
0 files (0K bytes) |
| Messages: | 294,267 |
| Posted today: | 0 |