Hello All,
when using Fido today I regularly hit the wall when I notice that I would li to *attach at least a picture* to illustrate something. Also, people keep sendig me fido messages that refer to pictures put on their web space. This feels odd.
Also, the current practice for *text styles is limited* in application and n well-defined. Still, this seems to be the minor of the two issues.
I think this is really something that could/should be addressed in some way enable relevant contemporary communication through fido.
To adress this, I see _at least_ two options:
1) Do it fully email-style by using MIME with HTML text and embedded/referen
pictures. This will be a lot to implement and particularly difficult to
handle in 16-Bit software due to memory restrictions and lack of framewor
Also, memory comes to mind when considering the size of the resulting
messages. Using @SPLIT, these could be extended beyound 63k, but the
resulting messages might be considered an annoyance.
2) Define a simple fidonet-compatible way that is more in line with existing
fido technology (particularly a maximum message length of 63k) but still
enables including at least a picture and maybe simple text styles while
maintaining readability on non-compatible systems.
I find both alternatives interesting, but currently I prefer the latter with focus on embedding the picture. The idea would by to have something that is more like the ability to post a picture on social media platforms. So instea of providing half a text processor for creating formatted text, people can j include the picture with their fidonet mail and ideally the editor will recompress the picture as needed to a jpg to limit the resuling message size including the encoding picture to 63k.
My idea for the latter would be to include the .jpg as Base64 and add a klud to it for inline-display. This could also be done for multiple images.
An alternative would be including a link to the picture like we do today, bu enabling the reader to automatically download such pictures and maybe includ automated upload/linking of the image in the editor. However, that would be quite dependent on other services.
*What do you think?*
Regards,
Tim
My idea for the latter would be to include the .jpg as Base64 and add a
klud to it for inline-display. This could also be done for multiple
images.
An alternative would be including a link to the picture like we do today,
bu enabling the reader to automatically download such pictures and maybe
includ automated upload/linking of the image in the editor. However, that
would be quite dependent on other services.
*What do you think?*
Regards,
Tim
Tim, I like the last one. An OLR that would then include the picture
from a posted link, if I follow you right.
Sysop: | Xerxes |
---|---|
Location: | Azle, Texas |
Users: | 131 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 97:10:59 |
Calls: | 3,190 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 195 |
U/L today: |
0 files (0K bytes) |
D/L today: |
0 files (0K bytes) |
Messages: | 366,173 |
Posted today: | 0 |