1. Forum
  2. DOVE-Net
  3. Synchronet Discussion

  • netmail via @fidonet domain

    From Ragnarok@VERT/DOCKSUD to DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion on Sunday, December 13, 2020 22:35:46
    Hi!

    I create a message via pop3 client to ragnarok@f26.n902.z4.fidonet
    through the sbbs smtp

    the sbbs create the netmail messages:

    root@scarlet:/sbbs/fido# ll netmail/
    total 12
    -rw------- 1 root root 378 dic 13 21:16 1.msg
    -rw------- 1 root root 378 dic 13 21:37 2.msg
    -rw------- 1 root root 381 dic 13 21:40 3.msg




    root@scarlet:/sbbs/fido# fmsgdump -ctrl -body netmail/3.msg
    fmsgdump rev 3.6 - Dump FidoNet Stored Messages

    Opening netmail/3.msg
    Subj: test 3
    Attr: 0x0181 (PRIVATE, KILLSENT, LOCAL)
    To : ragnarok (4:902/26.0)
    From: Ragnarok (4:902/26.0)
    Time: 13 Dec 20 21:39:04

    -start of message text-
    @INTL 4:902/26 4:902/26
    @TZUTC: -0300
    @MSGID: 185746@4:902/26 243ebfba
    @PID: Synchronet 3.18c-Linux master/b49632aac Dec 13 2020 GCC 6.3.0
    @CHRS: UTF-8 4
    test 3


    --- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux
    -end of message text-

    why aren't routed back these messages to my user if 4:902/26 is my address?

    should be add a special route rule to sbbsecho to work?
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Dock Sud BBS TLD 24 HS - bbs.docksud.com.ar
  • From Digital Man@VERT to Ragnarok on Sunday, December 13, 2020 17:58:04
    Re: netmail via @fidonet domain
    By: Ragnarok to DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion on Sun Dec 13 2020 10:35 pm

    Hi!

    I create a message via pop3 client to ragnarok@f26.n902.z4.fidonet
    through the sbbs smtp

    the sbbs create the netmail messages:

    root@scarlet:/sbbs/fido# ll netmail/
    total 12
    -rw------- 1 root root 378 dic 13 21:16 1.msg
    -rw------- 1 root root 378 dic 13 21:37 2.msg
    -rw------- 1 root root 381 dic 13 21:40 3.msg




    root@scarlet:/sbbs/fido# fmsgdump -ctrl -body netmail/3.msg
    fmsgdump rev 3.6 - Dump FidoNet Stored Messages

    Opening netmail/3.msg
    Subj: test 3
    Attr: 0x0181 (PRIVATE, KILLSENT, LOCAL)
    To : ragnarok (4:902/26.0)
    From: Ragnarok (4:902/26.0)
    Time: 13 Dec 20 21:39:04

    -start of message text-
    @INTL 4:902/26 4:902/26
    @TZUTC: -0300
    @MSGID: 185746@4:902/26 243ebfba
    @PID: Synchronet 3.18c-Linux master/b49632aac Dec 13 2020 GCC 6.3.0
    @CHRS: UTF-8 4
    test 3

    I'm not really clear what you're trying to do. Send another fidonet system, and that should work as expected. I don't think I anticipated someone sending to their own fidonet address via the SMTP gateway.
    --
    digital man

    Sling Blade quote #21:
    Karl: Coffee makes me nervous when I drink it. Mmm.
    Norco, CA WX: 59.9°F, 35.0% humidity, 3 mph SE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs

    ---
    ■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Fernando Toledo@VERT to Digital Man on Monday, December 14, 2020 00:15:23
    El 13/12/20 a las 22:58, Digital Man escribió:
    Re: netmail via @fidonet domain
    By: Ragnarok to DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion on Sun Dec 13 2020 10:35 pm

    > Hi!
    >
    > I create a message via pop3 client to ragnarok@f26.n902.z4.fidonet
    > through the sbbs smtp
    >
    > the sbbs create the netmail messages:
    >
    > root@scarlet:/sbbs/fido# ll netmail/
    > total 12
    > -rw------- 1 root root 378 dic 13 21:16 1.msg
    > -rw------- 1 root root 378 dic 13 21:37 2.msg
    > -rw------- 1 root root 381 dic 13 21:40 3.msg
    >
    >
    > root@scarlet:/sbbs/fido# fmsgdump -ctrl -body netmail/3.msg
    > fmsgdump rev 3.6 - Dump FidoNet Stored Messages
    >
    > Opening netmail/3.msg
    > Subj: test 3
    > Attr: 0x0181 (PRIVATE, KILLSENT, LOCAL)
    > To : ragnarok (4:902/26.0)
    > From: Ragnarok (4:902/26.0)
    > Time: 13 Dec 20 21:39:04
    >
    > -start of message text-
    > @INTL 4:902/26 4:902/26
    > @TZUTC: -0300
    > @MSGID: 185746@4:902/26 243ebfba
    > @PID: Synchronet 3.18c-Linux master/b49632aac Dec 13 2020 GCC 6.3.0
    > @CHRS: UTF-8 4
    > test 3

    I'm not really clear what you're trying to do. Send another fidonet system, and that should work as expected. I don't think I anticipated someone sending to their own fidonet address via the SMTP gateway.


    I just playing, sending another node/point work fine as you confirm, but
    just for test, i'm create messages with my "own" node address as
    destination to see behavior and found that these messages never taken
    and will dead files in the netmail directory.

    Also, i do not consider this as bug, but maybe should be generate a
    warning when sbbsecho process (skipped this files) in the netmail directory

    Saludos!
    --- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux
    * Origin: Dock Sud BBS - http://bbs.docksud.com.ar (4:902/26)
    ■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Fernando Toledo@VERT to Fernando Toledo on Monday, December 14, 2020 00:23:02
    El 14/12/20 a las 00:15, Fernando Toledo escribió:
    El 13/12/20 a las 22:58, Digital Man escribió:
    Re: netmail via @fidonet domain
    By: Ragnarok to DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion on Sun Dec 13 2020
    10:35 pm


    I'm not really clear what you're trying to do. Send another fidonet
    system, and that should work as expected. I don't think I anticipated
    someone sending to their own fidonet address via the SMTP gateway.


    I just playing, sending another node/point work fine as you confirm, but just for test, i'm create messages with my "own" node address as
    destination to see behavior and found that these messages never taken
    and will dead files in the netmail directory.

    Also, i do not consider this as bug, but maybe should be generate a
    warning when sbbsecho process (skipped this files) in the netmail directory

    Saludos!

    PS: I love this gating feature, i can send my arefix requests to my
    uplink from my thunderbird. So thanks!
    --- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux
    * Origin: Dock Sud BBS - http://bbs.docksud.com.ar (4:902/26)
    ■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Digital Man@VERT to Fernando Toledo on Sunday, December 13, 2020 20:01:56
    Re: Re: netmail via @fidonet domain
    By: Fernando Toledo to Digital Man on Mon Dec 14 2020 12:15 am

    El 13/12/20 a las 22:58, Digital Man escribió:
    Re: netmail via @fidonet domain
    By: Ragnarok to DOVE-Net.Synchronet_Discussion on Sun Dec 13 2020 10:35 pm

    > Hi!
    >
    > I create a message via pop3 client to ragnarok@f26.n902.z4.fidonet
    > through the sbbs smtp
    >
    > the sbbs create the netmail messages:
    >
    > root@scarlet:/sbbs/fido# ll netmail/
    > total 12
    > -rw------- 1 root root 378 dic 13 21:16 1.msg
    > -rw------- 1 root root 378 dic 13 21:37 2.msg
    > -rw------- 1 root root 381 dic 13 21:40 3.msg
    >
    >
    > root@scarlet:/sbbs/fido# fmsgdump -ctrl -body netmail/3.msg
    > fmsgdump rev 3.6 - Dump FidoNet Stored Messages
    >
    > Opening netmail/3.msg
    > Subj: test 3
    > Attr: 0x0181 (PRIVATE, KILLSENT, LOCAL)
    > To : ragnarok (4:902/26.0)
    > From: Ragnarok (4:902/26.0)
    > Time: 13 Dec 20 21:39:04
    >
    > -start of message text-
    > @INTL 4:902/26 4:902/26
    > @TZUTC: -0300
    > @MSGID: 185746@4:902/26 243ebfba
    > @PID: Synchronet 3.18c-Linux master/b49632aac Dec 13 2020 GCC 6.3.0
    > @CHRS: UTF-8 4
    > test 3

    I'm not really clear what you're trying to do. Send another fidonet system, and that should work as expected. I don't think I anticipated someone sending to their own fidonet address via the SMTP gateway.


    I just playing, sending another node/point work fine as you confirm, but just for test, i'm create messages with my "own" node address as
    destination to see behavior and found that these messages never taken
    and will dead files in the netmail directory.

    Also, i do not consider this as bug, but maybe should be generate a
    warning when sbbsecho process (skipped this files) in the netmail directory

    I tried this here and sbbsecho printed this to the local console:
    Scanning for Inbound NetMail Messages...
    /sbbs/fido/netmail/1.msg Rob Swindell (1:103/705) To: sysop (1:103/705) Created locally

    SBBSecho does not re-import locally-created netmail messages unless you have the echocfg "Ingore NetMail 'Local' Attributes" option enabled.
    --
    digital man

    Synchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #50:
    MUD = Multi-User Dungeon
    Norco, CA WX: 56.7°F, 42.0% humidity, 2 mph ESE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs

    ---
    ■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Ragnarok@VERT/DOCKSUD to Digital Man on Monday, December 14, 2020 03:35:18
    El 14/12/20 a las 01:01, Digital Man escribi¢:

    > destination to see behavior and found that these messages never taken
    > and will dead files in the netmail directory.
    >
    > Also, i do not consider this as bug, but maybe should be generate a
    > warning when sbbsecho process (skipped this files) in the netmail directory

    I tried this here and sbbsecho printed this to the local console:
    Scanning for Inbound NetMail Messages...
    /sbbs/fido/netmail/1.msg Rob Swindell (1:103/705) To: sysop (1:103/705) Created locally

    SBBSecho does not re-import locally-created netmail messages unless you have the echocfg "Ingore NetMail 'Local' Attributes" option enabled.


    Ahhhhhhhh ok! the message are not in the sbbsecho.log, only the console output, true?, for that reason I did not see it

    thanks!.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Dock Sud BBS TLD 24 HS - bbs.docksud.com.ar
  • From Digital Man@VERT to Ragnarok on Monday, December 14, 2020 09:32:41
    Re: Re: netmail via @fidonet domain
    By: Ragnarok to Digital Man on Mon Dec 14 2020 03:35 am

    I tried this here and sbbsecho printed this to the local console:
    Scanning for Inbound NetMail Messages...
    /sbbs/fido/netmail/1.msg Rob Swindell (1:103/705) To: sysop (1:103/705) Created locally

    Ahhhhhhhh ok! the message are not in the sbbsecho.log, only the console output, true?, for that reason I did not see it

    Correct.
    --
    digital man

    This Is Spinal Tap quote #20:
    Well, I'm sure I'd feel much worse if I weren't under such heavy sedation. Norco, CA WX: 56.5°F, 76.0% humidity, 3 mph WSW wind, 0.02 inches rain/24hrs

    ---
    ■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net