Hi There:

Any chance of getting the below implemented?

@MSG_THREAD_ID@ msg_thread_id number 3.16 message thread identifier (0 if unknown)
@MSG_THREAD_BACK@ msg_thread_back number 3.12 message thread, back message number
@MSG_THREAD_NEXT@ msg_thread_next number 3.10 message thread, next message number
@MSG_THREAD_FIRST@ msg_thread_first number 3.10 message thread, message number of

Thanks,
John

---
■ Synchronet ■ JCBBS what an unoriginal name:)

Hi There:

Any chance of getting the below implemented?

@MSG_THREAD_ID@ msg_thread_id number 3.16 message thread identifier (0 if unknown)
@MSG_THREAD_BACK@ msg_thread_back number 3.12 message thread, back message number
@MSG_THREAD_NEXT@ msg_thread_next number 3.10 message thread, next message number
@MSG_THREAD_FIRST@ msg_thread_first number 3.10 message thread, message number of

Thanks,
John

---
■ Synchronet ■ JCBBS what an unoriginal name:)

I totally agree 100%. Good ideas.

$ The Millionaire $

---
■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

I totally agree 100%. Good ideas.

You have absolutely no idea what you are agreeing too.

|15frank |08// |15netsurge
|07disksh0p|08!|07bbs |08% |07bbs.diskshop.ca |08% |07mystic goodness |11SciNet |03ftn hq |08% |07https://scinet-ftn.org

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2020/11/23 (Linux/64)
* Origin: % disksh0p!bbs % bbs.diskshop.ca % SciNet ftn hq % (1:229/101)
■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Re: More @ Codes
By: John to All on Sat Dec 05 2020 05:33 pm

Any chance of getting the below implemented?

@MSG_THREAD_ID@ msg_thread_id number 3.16 message thread identifier (0 if unknown) @MSG_THREAD_BACK@ msg_thread_back number 3.12 message thread, back message number @MSG_THREAD_NEXT@ msg_thread_next number 3.10 message thread, next message number @MSG_THREAD_FIRST@ msg_thread_first number 3.10 message thread, message number of

I would assume the 3.16, 3.12, and 3.10 are the version of Synchronet where those were introduced, suggesting they're already implemented.. Are they not working?

Nightfox

---
■ Synchronet ■ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com

Re: More @ Codes
By: Nightfox to John on Sat Dec 05 2020 08:08 pm

Re: More @ Codes
By: John to All on Sat Dec 05 2020 05:33 pm

Any chance of getting the below implemented?

@MSG_THREAD_ID@ msg_thread_id number 3.16 message thread identifier (0 if unknown) @MSG_THREAD_BACK@ msg_thread_back number 3.12 message thread, back message number @MSG_THREAD_NEXT@ msg_thread_next number 3.10 message thread, next message number @MSG_THREAD_FIRST@ msg_thread_first number 3.10 message thread, message number of

I would assume the 3.16, 3.12, and 3.10 are the version of Synchronet where those were introduced, suggesting they're already implemented.. Are they not working?

I think he was pasting from the jsobjs.html.
--
digital man

Synchronet "Real Fact" #38:
Synchronet first supported Windows NT-based operating systems w/v3.00b (2000). Norco, CA WX: 60.3°F, 21.0% humidity, 1 mph SSW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs

---
■ Synchronet ■ Vertrauen ■ Home of Synchronet ■ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Re: More @ Codes
By: Nightfox to John on Sat Dec 05 2020 08:08 pm

Re: More @ Codes
By: John to All on Sat Dec 05 2020 05:33 pm

Any chance of getting the below implemented?

@MSG_THREAD_ID@ msg_thread_id number 3.16 message thread identifier (0 if unknown) @MSG_THREAD_BACK@
msg_thread_back number 3.12 message thread, back message number @MSG_THREAD_NEXT@ msg_thread_next
number 3.10 message thread, next message number @MSG_THREAD_FIRST@ msg_thread_first number 3.10
message
thread, message number of

I would assume the 3.16, 3.12, and 3.10 are the version of Synchronet where those were introduced,
suggesting they're already implemented.. Are they not working?

Nightfox

Good Morning:

No they weren't, until Rob released them yesterday.

Thanks
John

---
■ Synchronet ■ JCBBS what an unoriginal name:)