• Do you prefer the HTML web interface or Webv4 interface?
• Not sure which I should trust the most
• 1) HTML/JS
• 2) Webv4
• 3) I only use SSH/Telnet
•  
  You cannot vote on this poll.

Trust is a relative thing; trust what exactly?

I use both runemaster web ui as well as webv4 ui, though webv4 is the more robust of the two, especially for modding web scripts. I also use telnet/ssh/rlogin, but the question is compare rune-master/webv4.

---
¡ Synchronet ¡ AlleyCat! BBS Lake Echo, NS Canada

Re: Do you prefer the HTML web interface or Webv4 interface?
By: Tenbucket to on Wed Nov 18 2020 12:07 am

Not sure which I should trust the most

1: HTML/JS [5 55.56%] √
2: Webv4 [4 44.44%] √

uhh.. The webv4 interface uses HTML and JavaScript, so I'm not sure what this question means. What are you referring to by the "HTML/JS" interface here?

Nightfox

---
■ Synchronet ■ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com

uhh.. The webv4 interface uses HTML and JavaScript, so I'm not sure what this question means. What are you referring to by the "HTML/JS" interface here?

Nightfox

I figured he meant 'preference' between the stock runmaster (../web/root) vs webv4 (../webv4/root)

---
¡ Synchronet ¡ AlleyCat! BBS Lake Echo, NS Canada

On 11/17/2020 10:07 PM, Tenbucket wrote:

Not sure which I should trust the most

1: HTML/JS
2: Webv4
3: I only use SSH/Telnet

HTTPS with either HTML/JS or Webv4 is probably the "safest". I think, assuming you've setup/enabled the Let's Encrypt functionality, it should likewise be a trustworthy cert for NNTP as well though.

SSH is fine if you trust the initial connection and Telnet is inherently insecure.

Still wish a few clients (like SyncTERM) supported a websocket endpoint
for RLogin.

--
Michael J. Ryan
tracker1 +o Roughneck BBS

---
­ Synchronet ­ Roughneck BBS - roughneckbbs.com