While I don't think it's you doing the gating, your point address
in your origin line for this echo on your test system probably
isn't helping the matter.
While I don't think it's you doing the gating, your point address
in your origin line for this echo on your test system probably
isn't helping the matter.
Let's see what a locally posted message does.
--- ScorpioBBS v0.31a (Linux/x86_64) * Origin: Project Scorpio TEST (21:1/175.6)
Hey Mike!
On Tue, Apr 21 2026 11:43:00 -0500, you wrote:
Let's see what a locally posted message does.
This one came through with CAPTEST as the BBSID again, but has your
FSX point in an origin line below.
--- ScorpioBBS v0.31a (Linux/x86_64) * Origin: Project Scorpio
TEST (21:1/175.6)
I noticed the last message I replied to you were in the "To" field.
If this one is wrong along with the other one, the above origin
line was the difference.
Regards, Nick
... Sarcasm, because beating people up is illegal.
Let's see what a locally posted message does.
you are replying to yourself in this msg
Curiouser and curiouser. ;)
---
* ScorpioBBS * Project Scorpio TEST
@MSGID: 1642.dove-hlp@723:1/0 2e4d2ec1
@REPLY: 1637.dove-hlp@723:1/0 2e4bdc7f
Curiouser and curiouser. ;)
---
* ScorpioBBS * Project Scorpio TEST
* Origin: _thePharcyde telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (723:1/0) SEEN-BY: 1/0 1 3 4
@PATH: 1/0 1
I wonder if it's because the MSGID and REPLY kludges are the same
address?
Hey Mro!
On Wed, Apr 22 2026 02:22:09 -0500, you wrote:
you are replying to yourself in this msg
Yeah, we realized that any time I reply to Mike's messages from his
"Scorpio TEST" system, things don't seem to be working correctly.
I don't think it's me that has the issue (as it happens via NNTP
and as well as Golded, I checked). I'm wondering if (some of) his
messages isn't including something that is needed, but I haven't
figured it out yet.
Saw him doing some testing on Fidonet, so maybe he figured it out
already.
Regards, Nick
... Sarcasm, because beating people up is illegal.
Saw him doing some testing on Fidonet, so maybe he figured it out already.
@MSGID: 1642.dove-hlp@723:1/0 2e4d2ec1
@REPLY: 1637.dove-hlp@723:1/0 2e4bdc7f
Curiouser and curiouser. ;)
---
* ScorpioBBS * Project Scorpio TEST
* Origin: _thePharcyde telnet://bbs.pharcyde.org (Wisconsin) (723:1/0) SEEN-BY: 1/0 1 3 4
@PATH: 1/0 1
And here's Golded. Worked here, but something is awry with NNTP via Synchronet
as I noticed when I posted it replied to myself.
I wonder if it's because the MSGID and REPLY kludges are the same address?
I don't think I have exactly just yet. I need to add the DOVE Sysop
echo and stop testing in this one! ;)
* ScorpioWeb * Project Scorpio TEST
While I know there is something wonky on my end, as you are the only
one having this issue, I wonder if there is not also something wonky
with NNTP via Synchronet and/or Thunderbird that is also playing a
role?
Mike Powell wrote to Accession <=-
Saw him doing some testing on Fidonet, so maybe he figured it out already.
I don't think I have exactly just yet. I need to add the DOVE Sysop
echo and stop testing in this one! ;)
I don't think I have exactly just yet. I need to add the DOVE Sysop
echo and stop testing in this one! ;)
* ScorpioWeb * Project Scorpio TEST
If it helps any, this one seemed like it contained a lot more headers. Maybe my
reply will actually be to you this time. ;)
I'm curious as to why you'd want to gate DOVEnet to FTN? I thought
most BBS packages support QWK networking.
That does help. Sounds like no headers works.
Saw him doing some testing on Fidonet, so maybe he figured it out already.
I don't think I have exactly just yet. I need to add the DOVE Sysop echo and stop testing in this one! ;)
I'm curious as to why you'd want to gate DOVEnet to FTN? I thought most
BBS packages support QWK networking.
Hey Poindexter!
On Fri, Apr 24 2026 09:23:50 -0500, you wrote:
I'm curious as to why you'd want to gate DOVEnet to FTN? I thought
most BBS packages support QWK networking.
Most BBS packages support QWK/REP packets for offline reading,
not QWK networking. Two different things, yet similar.. but not.
;)
i always wondered about this. is there ANY other bbs software
that supports qwk networking by design?
i always wondered about this. is there ANY other bbs software
that supports qwk networking by design?
Hey MRO!
On Sat, 25 Apr 2026 02:30:01 , you wrote:
i always wondered about this. is there ANY other bbs software that supports qwk networking by design?
Mystic does.
I can't speak for the other newer packages out there now like Enigma, Talisman, or whatever else has come about somewhat recently,
though.
I can't speak for the other newer packages out there now like Enigma, Talisman,
or whatever else has come about somewhat recently, though.
| Sysop: | Xerxes |
|---|---|
| Location: | Azle, Texas |
| Users: | 158 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 493879:04:50 |
| Calls: | 3,350 |
| Calls today: | 0 |
| Files: | 198 |
| U/L today: |
0 files (0K bytes) |
| D/L today: |
23 files (531K bytes) |
| Messages: | 103,737 |
| Posted today: | 0 |