Yet I've watched some of her interviews, not all of them, and seen nothing likewhat you say.
You're either lying, or dumber than she is.
Even more clueless than most of the flaming libtards that pass through here. Olympic gold level of cluelessness.
OK so since you gave no intellegent argument, why are you posting in debate forum?
Because I want to. Because I call out bullshitters, liars, and trolls when I see them. I'm thinking you may be all three of those.
halian wrote to Gamgee <=-
Because I want to. Because I call out bullshitters, liars, and trolls when I see them. I'm thinking you may be all three of those.
Neofree is none of those; instead all three of those terms more aptly describe YOU. Especially since you insist on calling everyone who dares
to break ranks from Your Holiness' dogmatic coprolalia the R-word or
some churlish, childish variant thereof.
Project 2025 is Trump's Policy.
Thats completely untrue - he told us as much a day after this misinformati hit mainstream... I would assume that you don't believe his statements - b I'd assume it lands somewhere more in the middle; I don't think Trump supp the ENTIRE 2025 policy - but could agree with you that some of his stances would align with it. I don't, however, think he is as radical as the entir 700+ page text.
One of the most terrifying things he wants to do is change a large ch of low level federal civil service workers from standard hires to political appointees, so they can install loyal cult members into the positions.
Why is that terrifying; when every other politician from Biden to Obama to and beyond does the EXACT same thing?? I could understand if you don't agr with these appointees - but this is the nature of the beast...
Trump tried to do this with Exectuive order Schedule F https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/presidential-actions/executive-o ing-schedule-f-excepted-service/
Biden recinded it 3 days after he took office, so it didn't go into effect.
[snip]
I agree with this sentiment.... why wouldn't we?
And no matter how much Trump tries to distance himself from Project 2025, is absolutely is his policy. nearly everyone he surrounds himse with is involved with it in some way.
Hard disagree - he told us as much...
Yes, turning the choice over to the states has certainly lead to all (and sometimes downright illogical) bans, and a lot of Republican politicians are responsible/behind it, and I disagree with them on it
I do too - however, a decade ago it was exactly what BOTH sides wanted. On abortion, I'm pro-choice - PERIOD... but how bad IS the states taking over think it puts the vote in PEOPLES hands - I don't agree with it, but I ref to lie and make it the topic that the left wants to...
Rent is $2000; food is up 40%; gas is freaking insane; insurances are up 2 I have less $$$; I've never worried this much in my life; a soda costs $4 Seattle; people who go viral make $100M in a year; press record, in 2024 i almost the only way...
Trump 2024; more and more everyday.
The quote answers your question: the problem with kicking the abortion issue t
the states *is* the all-out bans that quite a few states have enacted.
Nevermind that Trump would severely restrict abortions in several ways, as outlined throughout Project 2025.
The government has no right telling a person what medical procedures they can and can't have.
The solution is to tax, or failing that eat the rich.
The solution is to tax, or failing
that eat, the rich.
Arelor wrote to halian <=-
Specifically, when you adjust the economic machine to ensure the low
and middle classes have money but you don't have a productive fabric in place, what you get is runaway inflation and people unable to secure affrdable food and housing. I am sure this rings a bell.
This notion comes from the naive idea that the government has a better use for
the money than the money's rightful owners.
There is also the problem that money is not the end-all-be-all of economy. If you have a system of money redistribution in place in order to ensure the poor
have money and the rich don't have as much, but the productive fabric of the country is damaged, then buying a loaf of bread will be still worth 50 bucks and poor people will still be poor people.
Specifically, when you adjust the economic machine to ensure the low and middl
classes have money but you don't have a productive fabric in place, what you get is runaway inflation and people unable to secure affrdable food and housing. I am sure this rings a bell.
Dumas Walker wrote to ARELOR <=-
People who vote for left-leaning candidates do not understand this.
Runaway inflation is part of what lead to the rise of the Nazi's in Germany, and the rise of other totalitarian regimes (both fascist and communist) in other places.
Sysop: | Xerxes |
---|---|
Location: | Azle, Texas |
Users: | 131 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 95:17:45 |
Calls: | 3,190 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 195 |
U/L today: |
0 files (0K bytes) |
D/L today: |
0 files (0K bytes) |
Messages: | 366,148 |
Posted today: | 0 |