Are you aware that the first hearing will be aired on ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, and CNN (but not Fox News)?
I'm just curious how much of the news that Fox News doesn't report on makes it your way.
Are you aware that the first hearing will be aired on ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, and CNN (but not Fox News)?They'll report on it, they're just not airing it.
I'm just curious how much of the news that Fox News doesn't report on makes it your way.
Fox News viewers don't want to watch every moment of that crap.And Fox News knows this. After they were the first to call Arizona for Biden, their viewership and ratings plummeted. Nevermind that they made the correct call; their sin was telling their viewers something they didn't want to hear.
It'sIt's an investigation into an insurrection and attempted coup. If Trump was involved, then Trump was involved.
just more Trump bashing, and it's getting old.
Conservatives are annoyedThe Senate is refusing to pass any effective gun control laws; what more
that the senate doesn't do more to protect the American people from violence,
and that they do nothing about Biden's humanitarian crisis atHave you tried "thoughts & prayers?" It seems to be working spectacularly for mass shootings.
the border.
If they would fix those 2 problems, then we'd leisurely
watch more witch hunt.
They'll report on it, they're just not airing it.
That wasn't the question. The question was, did you know that it was occurring?
Fox News has a unique audience: They don't want to know what's really going on; they want their news to tell them what they want to hear.
It's an investigation into an insurrection and attempted coup. If Trump was involved, then Trump was involved.
The Senate is refusing to pass any effective gun control laws; what more could you ask for?
The US Capitol was attacked by conservatives angry that they'd lost an election. Is that acceptable to you? Is this the new norm? Is this what's supposed to happen from now on when a conservative presidential candidate loses?
Nevermind that the reason stated by the conservatives for the loss -- widespread voter fraud -- has absolutely zero evidence supporting it even now, a year and a half later.
No, I wasn't up to date about the committee hearings, and I'm still not.They'll report on it, they're just not airing it.That wasn't the question. The question was, did you know that it was occurring?
Fox News has a unique audience: They don't want to know what's really going on; they want their news to tell them what they want to hear.That's how all the news channels are. It's business before information.
It's an investigation into an insurrection and attempted coup. If Tru was involved, then Trump was involved.The group of people I call the "collective" (media, democrats, celebrities, billionaires) are still up to their old tricks. They're scared of a conservative takeover, so they won't let the dust settle
until after another Joe victory.
We'll know as much about the
insurrection after this is over as we do now.
The Senate is refusing to pass any effective gun control laws; what m could you ask for?Gun control laws won't help while we have an open border. Anything Americans need (heroin, fentanyl, slaves, guns) can travel here, as long as there's a demand for it.
How about metal detector laws? Those are the kind of laws I'd like to see worked on immediately. School safety laws, instead of "disarm honest Americans while dishonest Americans will buy from the black market."
The US Capitol was attacked by conservatives angry that they'd lost a election. Is that acceptable to you? Is this the new norm? Is this wh supposed to happen from now on when a conservative presidential candi loses?They were already arrested. Give them the chair if you want.
Nevermind that the reason stated by the conservatives for the loss -- widespread voter fraud -- has absolutely zero evidence supporting it now, a year and a half later.That was stated by Trump, not by conservatives.
They'll report on it, they're just not airing it.
That wasn't the question. The question was, did you know that it was occurring?
No, I wasn't up to date about the committee hearings, and I'm still not.
The question should be "did we care?"No, I wasn't up to date about the committee hearings, and I'm still not.They'll report on it, they're just not airing it.That wasn't the question. The question was, did you know that it wa occurring?
I watched The Andy Griffith Show on Me TV at 8pm. Opie had to deal with
a new kid/bully that was getting his friends in trouble. It was the famous Barney Fife "Nip it in the Bud!" episode.
At 8:30pm, I went to bed so I could get up and start my work day on time.
On 06-09-22 19:57, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Jeff Thiele about Re: Question for Fox News <=-
No, I wasn't up to date about the committee hearings, and I'm still
not.
Fox News has a unique audience: They don't want to know what's really going on; they want their news to tell them what they want to hear.
That's how all the news channels are. It's business before
information.
It's an investigation into an insurrection and attempted coup. If Trump was involved, then Trump was involved.
The group of people I call the "collective" (media, democrats, celebrities, billionaires) are still up to their old tricks. They're scared of a conservative takeover, so they won't let the dust settle
until after another Joe victory. We'll know as much about the insurrection after this is over as we do now.
The US Capitol was attacked by conservatives angry that they'd lost an election. Is that acceptable to you? Is this the new norm? Is this what's supposed to happen from now on when a conservative presidential candidate loses?
They were already arrested. Give them the chair if you want.
Nevermind that the reason stated by the conservatives for the loss -- widespread voter fraud -- has absolutely zero evidence supporting it even now, a year and a half later.
That was stated by Trump, not by conservatives.
You're wrong. It's an investigation into an insurrection and attempted coup.
As someone who actually watched the first hearing, I disagree. Also,
much of what you think you know is false, if it came from Fox News or Republicans (including Trump).
Americans need (heroin, fentanyl, slaves, guns) can travel here, as l as there's a demand for it.
The border, which is not "open," has nothing to do with mass shootings.
Why do you jump straight to disarmament? There are plenty of proposed
laws that don't involve mass disarmament. To be fair, increased
mentalhealth services, which many Republicans claim to support, would result in disarmament of those honest Americans deemed incapable of responsibly owning weapons, would it not?
They were already arrested. Give them the chair if you want.
It should never have happened in the first place. They were misled by Trump's lies about the election.
That was stated by Trump, not by conservatives.
There were plenty of conservatives who went along with it, and still do.
It was stated by Trump, who is still the leader of a large portion of
the right wing conseratives, and they believed him and followed his
order to go to the Capital.
No, I wasn't up to date about the committee hearings, and I'm still not.
The question should be "did we care?"
until after another Joe victory. We'll know as much about the insurrection after this is over as we do now.
I know more about the insurrection now after the first public hearing
than I knew yesterday.
Nevermind that the reason stated by the conservatives for the loss -- widespread voter fraud -- has absolutely zero evidence supporting it now, a year and a half later.
That was stated by Trump, not by conservatives.
It was stated by Trump, who is still the leader of a large portion of
the right wing conseratives, and they believed him and followed his
order to go to the Capital.
You're wrong. It's an investigation into an insurrection and attempte coup.If they're able to put Trump in jail, do you think that will be enough fuel for the media to distract everyone from Joe's failures into
November?
As someone who actually watched the first hearing, I disagree. Also, much of what you think you know is false, if it came from Fox News or Republicans (including Trump).Fox News is leftism in disguise.
No, but the border is a security conflict that will put illegalized assault weapons into the hands of criminals only, especially if the bill is signed. Lawful gun owners will be outgunned by criminals.Americans need (heroin, fentanyl, slaves, guns) can travel here, as there's a demand for it.The border, which is not "open," has nothing to do with mass shooting
Why do you jump straight to disarmament? There are plenty of proposed laws that don't involve mass disarmament. To be fair, increasedI'm not jumping to disarmament, but the House is.
Heroin kills people. Maybe we should make a law against heroin posession? Would that fix it?
mentalhealth services, which many Republicans claim to support, would result in disarmament of those honest Americans deemed incapable of responsibly owning weapons, would it not?No, because not everyone is having a mental health assessment done. Besides, a doctor can't accurately predict if a patient is going to hurt someone, but metal detectors, puffer machines, and body scanners CAN
make those predictions.
Everyone gets misled by lies, but that doesn't mean it's ok to break the law. Biden told you that "white people are the biggest threat to homeland security," so armed with that advice, if you shoot a bunch of white people, you can just say "I did it because Biden misled me.."They were already arrested. Give them the chair if you want.It should never have happened in the first place. They were misled by Trump's lies about the election.
Is that what your people are trying to fix? Other people's opinionsThat was stated by Trump, not by conservatives.There were plenty of conservatives who went along with it, and still
about the election? It's time to move on.
Have they addressed an issue of Nancy Pelosi reducing security on theuntil after another Joe victory. We'll know as much about the insurrection after this is over as we do now.I know more about the insurrection now after the first public hearing than I knew yesterday.
day of the attack?
It was stated by Trump, who is still the leader of a large portion of the right wing conseratives, and they believed him and followed his order to go to the Capital.George Soros is the leader of a large population of leftists, and he
said that he wants criminals to be out of jail, but it would be a
stretch for me to declare that Georgie is the cause of the current crime crisis that we're all dealing with.
It was stated by Trump, who is still the leader of a large portion of the right wing conseratives, and they believed him and followed his order to go to the Capital.And the ones that actually stormed and went into the Capital disobeyed
his order to be peaceful.
On 06-11-22 11:40, Mike Powell <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Question for Fox New <=-
It was stated by Trump, who is still the leader of a large portion of
the right wing conseratives, and they believed him and followed his
order to go to the Capital.
And the ones that actually stormed and went into the Capital disobeyed
his order to be peaceful.
On 06-11-22 18:52, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Question for Fox New <=-
I know more about the insurrection now after the first public hearing
than I knew yesterday.
Have they addressed an issue of Nancy Pelosi reducing security on the
day of the attack?
George Soros is the leader of a large population of leftists, and he
said that he wants criminals to be out of jail, but it would be a
stretch for me to declare that Georgie is the cause of the current
crime crisis that we're all dealing with.
On 06-10-22 18:11, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Jeff Thiele about Re: Question for Fox News <=-
The border, which is not "open," has nothing to do with mass shootings.
No, but the border is a security conflict that will put illegalized assault weapons into the hands of criminals only, especially if the
bill is signed. Lawful gun owners will be outgunned by criminals.
Everyone gets misled by lies,
but that doesn't mean it's ok to break the law.
Biden told you that "white people are the biggest threat to
homeland security," so armed with that advice, if you shoot a bunch of white people, you can just say "I did it because Biden misled me.."
Everyone gets misled by lies,Many people have enough sense to know a lie when they hear / see one.
Biden told you that "white people are the biggest threat toProve that Biden said that. You seem to be equating his statement of "white nationalists" to be the same as "white people". It definitely is not the same.
homeland security," so armed with that advice, if you shoot a bunch o white people, you can just say "I did it because Biden misled me.."
First of all, the January 6 committee does not have the power to put
Trump in jail. Secondly, it's not a distraction; most people can deal
with multiple things at the same time. Thirdly, Biden is not on the
ballot in November.
Fox News is leftism in disguise.
Only from a far-right perspective, where everything that's not far-right is "leftist."
assault weapons into the hands of criminals only, especially if the b is signed. Lawful gun owners will be outgunned by criminals.
So you're saying that assault weapons outclass any other type of legal firearm? What happened to the argument that they're just like any other semi-automatice rifle?
I'm not jumping to disarmament, but the House is.
No, they're not.
Heroin kills people. Maybe we should make a law against heroin posess Would that fix it?
It helps.
Using your own logic, those machines can't predict if a person is going
to hurt someone because not everyone is walking through them. People
only have to walk through them in places where they're set up.
And what do you propose should happen if one of the machines detects a firearm? Certainly not disarming the person, right?
Everyone gets misled by lies, but that doesn't mean it's ok to break law. Biden told you that "white people are the biggest threat to home security," so armed with that advice, if you shoot a bunch of white people, you can just say "I did it because Biden misled me.."
Bullshit, Biden never said that. You're equating white people with white supremacists, but not all white people are white supremacists so your argument is bullshit.
Is that what your people are trying to fix? Other people's opinions about the election? It's time to move on.
It is time to address what happened and then move on.
Have they addressed an issue of Nancy Pelosi reducing security on the day of the attack?
The Speaker of the House doesn't have the authority to increase or reduce security. Your argument is Bullsh!t.
George Soros is not a political leader.
The question should be "did we care?"
I can sense that the media (and their delegates) want us to care, and they want us to watch the coverage. Surely Schiff and the others will use the opportunity to create a presentation for the voters at home.
All this leftist devotion to Trump is going to prove useless if we elect Ron Desantis in 2024.
And the ones that actually stormed and went into the Capital disobeyed his order to be peaceful.
But they did follow his statement that it would be "wild".
Plus others did say to "kick ass and take names".
George Soros is the leader of a large population of leftists, and he said that
he wants criminals to be out of jail, but it would be a stretch for me to declare that Georgie is the cause of the current crime crisis that we're all dealing with.
First of all, the January 6 committee does not have the power to put Trump in jail. Secondly, it's not a distraction; most people can deal with multiple things at the same time. Thirdly, Biden is not on the ballot in November.What's the point then? What are they trying to get out of this? Biden's not on the ballot, but a lot of idiots who've supported him are, like Chuck Schumer. Voters should be consciencious of whether or not they're voting for a Biden (destroyer of the USA) supporter or not.
Fox News is trying to subtly control conservatives, and I'm certain that it's for the purpose of serving the left's (your) agenda.Fox News is leftism in disguise.Only from a far-right perspective, where everything that's not far-ri is "leftist."
For example, they have a comments section that's littered with racist comments (mostly against blacks.) Why? Other news sites have removed
their comments sections years ago. Fox News is fomenting racism in their own special way, and that's not conservative.
That was someone else's argument.assault weapons into the hands of criminals only, especially if is signed. Lawful gun owners will be outgunned by criminals.So you're saying that assault weapons outclass any other type of lega firearm? What happened to the argument that they're just like any oth semi-automatice rifle?
Ok, let's call it something else then, like "slight disarmament."I'm not jumping to disarmament, but the House is.No, they're not.
My point of that is that there are already laws against heroinHeroin kills people. Maybe we should make a law against heroin p Would that fix it?It helps.
possession, but people possess it anyway, and they'll do the same with assault weapons if that's what they're into.
Using your own logic, those machines can't predict if a person is goi to hurt someone because not everyone is walking through them. People only have to walk through them in places where they're set up.Schools need to have centralized entrances where people entering can be screened. They used to do it at the local high school here, but they stopped. I guess there probably wasn't enough "racial equity" in the
metal detectors.
And what do you propose should happen if one of the machines detects firearm? Certainly not disarming the person, right?No but the officer posted at the entrance can make them leave the property.
Ok, my mistake, but Biden said "White supremacists are the biggest threat." So if you take that advice, and shoot whites who look supremicist-ish, then you can defend yourself by saying "Biden said they're the biggest threat!"Everyone gets misled by lies, but that doesn't mean it's ok to b law. Biden told you that "white people are the biggest threat to security," so armed with that advice, if you shoot a bunch of wh people, you can just say "I did it because Biden misled me.."Bullshit, Biden never said that. You're equating white people with wh supremacists, but not all white people are white supremacists so your argument is bullshit.
Thanks for that confirmation! The leftists want to fix the opinions that people have about the 2020 election. They want to broadcast it on theIs that what your people are trying to fix? Other people's opini about the election? It's time to move on.It is time to address what happened and then move on.
mega screen in Times Square that "Trump was wrong about the 2020 election!" Like anyone really cares?
The claim is that she didn't allow the national guard to post at the capitol building during the attack. I didn't make the claim, I read itHave they addressed an issue of Nancy Pelosi reducing security o day of the attack?The Speaker of the House doesn't have the authority to increase or re security. Your argument is [REDACTED].
on a dozen news websites.
George Soros is not a political leader.He's a political commander.
Have they addressed an issue of Nancy Pelosi reducing security on the day of the attack?
Did she? That is the first I have heard that she did that. Can you
give me a reference to read?
George Soros is the leader of a large population of leftists, and he said that he wants criminals to be out of jail, but it would be a stretch for me to declare that Georgie is the cause of the current crime crisis that we're all dealing with.
What has that got to do with the topic of discussion wrt Jan 6 hearings?
Illegal weapons coming into the USA do not travel via the same routes
that immigrants (legal or illegal) do. Neither do drugs. As to lawful
Biden told you that "white people are the biggest threat to
homeland security," so armed with that advice, if you shoot a bunch o white people, you can just say "I did it because Biden misled me.."
Prove that Biden said that. You seem to be equating his statement of "white nationalists" to be the same as "white people". It definitely is not the same.
I really don't care because I feel like I know what I need to know. The people who broke into the Capital Building (the ones that actually broke in and/or used force, not the ones that were *let in*) and/or were
violent and/or vandals need to be punished.
Me watching the coverage is not going to make it any more/less likely
that they get punished. I have seen and heard everything that Trump
Agreed. I would rather we not nominate Trump. He has his staunch loyalists but what they don't understand is that he also turned a lot of people off between 2016 (when they voted for him) and 2020 (when they did not).
George Soros is the leader of a large population of leftists, and he sai that
he wants criminals to be out of jail, but it would be a stretch for me t declare that Georgie is the cause of the current crime crisis that we're dealing with.
Do you have some context here? I would guess he did not mean all of
them.
The point is that Trump abused his power, acted illegally, and tried to destroy the USA's democracy. We need to find out exactly what happened so that we can prevent it from happening again.
Schools need to have centralized entrances where people entering can screened. They used to do it at the local high school here, but they stopped. I guess there probably wasn't enough "racial equity" in the metal detectors.
The Buffalo shooting was at a supermarket.
So now we need a machine and an officer at every school in the country, just so that people can continue to own assault weapons?
They want to get to the bottom of what happened on January 6.
The point is that Trump abused his power, acted illegally, and tried to destroy the USA's democracy. We need to find out exactly what happened so that we can prevent it from happening again.
Not exactly. Trump claims that he offered to deploy the National Guard, and made this offer to Pelosi. The Speaker of the House is not in charge of security, so even if this offer was made, that was not her job. She
in no way "didn't allow" the National Guard to be deployed, because that is also not her job, and outside of her authority.
The point is that Trump abused his power, acted illegally, and tried destroy the USA's democracy. We need to find out exactly what happene that we can prevent it from happening again.Are you sure now is a convenient time for your people to be trying to prevent presidents from abusing their power?
Maybe it's more convenient than I thought; they know Biden's on his way out, so now could be a good time to check the powers of the next
president (because it will be a Republican.)
Not exactly. Trump claims that he offered to deploy the National Guar and made this offer to Pelosi. The Speaker of the House is not in cha of security, so even if this offer was made, that was not her job. Sh in no way "didn't allow" the National Guard to be deployed, because t is also not her job, and outside of her authority.I read that the Sergeant at Arms (who answers to Pelosi) rejected the request which was made by the police chief. That conflicts with what you're saying. Unless both are true, and both requests were denied.
Are you sure now is a convenient time for your people to be trying to prevent presidents from abusing their power?
Presidents should never abuse their powers. Do you have specific allegations of Biden abusing his power, as you seem to be implying?
Yea, here are a few cases of it:Are you sure now is a convenient time for your people to be tryi prevent presidents from abusing their power?Presidents should never abuse their powers. Do you have specific allegations of Biden abusing his power, as you seem to be implying?
1) Biden border crisis, Biden crime crisis, Biden D.A. crisis
2) Biden threatening to hold aid from Ukraine unless they fire the prosecutor 3) Reducing police power during a crime crisis
4) Biden lying about his son's foreign business endeavors
I read that the Sergeant at Arms (who answers to Pelosi) rejected the request which was made by the police chief. That conflicts with what you're saying. Unless both are true, and both requests were denied.
Whichever is true, it was not Pelosi's decision to make, which makes your previous statement a lie.
It wasn't a lie, I guess I was wrong, but I don't lie to win arguments.I read that the Sergeant at Arms (who answers to Pelosi) rejecte request which was made by the police chief. That conflicts with you're saying. Unless both are true, and both requests were deniWhichever is true, it was not Pelosi's decision to make, which makes previous statement a lie.
On 06-12-22 10:46, Mike Powell <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Question for Fox New <=-
Like I told Aaron, I have no need to watch the circus. I already
believe that the ones who committed crimes (breaking and entering, assault, theft, vandalism) should be punished. Those who were there,
were let in, and did not do anything should not.
Other speakers were clearly inciting trouble and should also get in trouble.
On 06-12-22 15:18, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Question for Fox New <=-
Did she? That is the first I have heard that she did that. Can you
give me a reference to read?
https://mynbc15.com/news/nation-world/trump-admin-was-ready- to-deploy-national- uard-on-jan-6-capitol-police-timeline-shows-january-donald
I don't know anything for a fact, except that this news report
indicates that the former capitol police chief made a request to the
house and senate Sergeant at Arms (both of which report to
Pelosi/McConnel respectively) to deploy the national guard for the
planned January 6 event, but the former police chief said that his
request was denied.
I like to blame Pelosi for things, but blame can also be put Irving & Stenger (Sergeants at arms.) But Pelosi had no problem with deploying
the national guard in the days that followed, for narrative purposes.
On 06-12-22 15:26, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Question for Fox New <=-
Illegal weapons coming into the USA do not travel via the same routes
that immigrants (legal or illegal) do. Neither do drugs. As to lawful
Then why are border patrol agents recovering record quantitites of fentanyl?
Biden told you that "white people are the biggest threat to
homeland security," so armed with that advice, if
you shoot a bunch o
white people, you can just say "I did it because Biden misled me.."
Prove that Biden said that. You seem to be equating his statement of "white nationalists" to be the same as "white people". It definitely is not the same.
I mistyped that Biden quote. But the point is that it's wrong to blame Trump for the attack just because he got people riled up.
On 06-12-22 03:12, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Jeff Thiele about Re: Question for Fox News <=-
My point of that is that there are already laws against heroin
possession, but people possess it anyway, and they'll do the same with assault weapons if that's what they're into.
On 06-12-22 17:26, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Jeff Thiele about Re: Question for Fox News <=-
The point is that Trump abused his power, acted illegally, and tried to destroy the USA's democracy. We need to find out exactly what happened so that we can prevent it from happening again.
What is still unknown about what happened?
Then why are border patrol agents recovering record quantitites of fentanyl?
I don't know. Where did they recover that fentanyl? Was is from immigrants crossing the river (unlikely) or from the sixteen wheelers crossing at a highway border crossing (likely) or from tunnels (also likely)?
What is still unknown about what happened?
Only last week, I learned something new. Namely that the leaders of the Proud Boys and the Oathkeepers met in a garage on Jan 5 to discuss plans for the 6th. Did you know that? and when did you know it?
I didn't know that. And I can see how that story sorta backs up Biden's "biggest threat" narrative. But what good does it do? More arrests to come?What is still unknown about what happened?Only last week, I learned something new. Namely that the leaders of Proud Boys and the Oathkeepers met in a garage on Jan 5 to discuss pl for the 6th. Did you know that? and when did you know it?
The media calls them "Trump supporters," and Jeff calls them "conservatives." I think their angle is to maintain the alienation of conservatives. "You guys did this!" and "If you continue to vote Republican then it means that you wanted those people to get hurt on January 6!"
Trump could do us all a huge favor by running for congress, but he's too full of himself to do that. Everyone just wants to be president.
For a while, Candace Owens was talking about launching a presidential campaign
but she too needs to get off her high horse. I wrote to her and told her something like "Candace, our state (NY) is being destroyed by Democrats and no GOP candidate is even running for assembly in like 30 districts. Do us a favor and run for state assembly so you can help fix our state!" She'd totally
win if she ran, but no, it's president or nothing.
George Soros is the leader of a large population of leftists, and he sa
that
he wants criminals to be out of jail, but it would be a stretch for me declare that Georgie is the cause of the current crime crisis that we'r
dealing with.
Do you have some context here? I would guess he did not mean all of them.
George Soros is trying to overhaul our justice system by financing the campaigns of Democrat progressive DAs who are minimizing prosecutions accross the country.
believe that the ones who committed crimes (breaking and entering, assault, theft, vandalism) should be punished. Those who were there, were let in, and did not do anything should not.
All of the above are criminal offenses. The second group are milder,
and those who have been arrested have often been let off with probation.
What you left out of the first group is the primary purpose of some,
namely to interupt or prevent the counting of the electoral votes in the hopes of somehow letting Trump get away with a successful coup.
First of all, the January 6 committee does not have the power to put Trump in jail. Secondly, it's not a distraction; most people can deal with multiple things at the same time. Thirdly, Biden is not on the ballot in November.
What's the point then? What are they trying to get out of this? Biden's not on
the ballot, but a lot of idiots who've supported him are, like Chuck Schumer. Voters should be consciencious of whether or not they're voting for a Biden (destroyer of the USA) supporter or not.
I'm not jumping to disarmament, but the House is.
No, they're not.
Ok, let's call it something else then, like "slight disarmament."
My point of that is that there are already laws against heroin possession, but
people possess it anyway, and they'll do the same with assault weapons if that's what they're into.
Thanks for that confirmation! The leftists want to fix the opinions that people have about the 2020 election. They want to broadcast it on the mega screen in Times Square that "Trump was wrong about the 2020 election!" Like anyone really cares?
The media calls them "Trump supporters," and Jeff calls them "conservati I think their angle is to maintain the alienation of conservatives. "You did this!" and "If you continue to vote Republican then it means that yo wanted those people to get hurt on January 6!"That would be a good example of black-and-white thinking on their part, but I have seen similar applied here before when it comes to Republicans.
If they can prove that they were attempting to disrupt the count MP>ofelectoral votes, those that they can prove that of should also MP>be punished.
On 06-13-22 16:49, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Question for Fox New <=-
What is still unknown about what happened?
Only last week, I learned something new. Namely that the leaders of the Proud Boys and the Oathkeepers met in a garage on Jan 5 to discuss plans for the 6th. Did you know that? and when did you know it?
I didn't know that. And I can see how that story sorta backs up
Biden's "biggest threat" narrative. But what good does it do? More
arrests to come?
Then again, for celebrities and people who think they are, you are probably right... it is probably President or nothing. :)
Ok, now I see where the jump to "wants all criminals out of jail" comes from. If Soros is really financing these campaigns, then it does sound like he is not from the "hard on crime" line of thinking. I have read somewhere, other than here, that he does put money into progressive DA's campaigns but I don't remember where so I cannot say now how credible I believe it to be.
As with every midterm, the sitting President (and the policies of his administration) are indirectly on the ballot. Midterms can change a President's term. Bill Clinton was on his way to being a single-term President until the Republicans cleaned up during his first midterm.
The biggest reason Trump lost in 2020 was the same biggest reason that Hilary lost in 2016... they both preached too much to their own choir. Hilary did not visit a lot of place and mostly preached to the large
urban areas (and called people in other areas names). Trump preached to his base and did not account much at all for those in "the center" that voted for him in 2016.
But for Trump, had he not ruined his once impeccable reputation as president,
he could have moved on and ran for congress in Florida, and that way he'd still be able to help all of America, just in a slightly smaller way.
know. They focused on the Trump group making claims that the election
was stolen, that Trump knew that his fraud statements were false but making them anyway, and as a side comment how Trump used the election fraud story to dupe $250,000,000 out of those who believed him. At
least some of that money went to various cronies -- but they did not say where most of it went.
know. They focused on the Trump group making claims that the electio was stolen, that Trump knew that his fraud statements were false but making them anyway, and as a side comment how Trump used the election fraud story to dupe $250,000,000 out of those who believed him. At least some of that money went to various cronies -- but they did not where most of it went.Are any of those things illegal? What if the money went to attorney fees?
As with every midterm, the sitting President (and the policies of his administration) are indirectly on the ballot. Midterms can change a President's term. Bill Clinton was on his way to being a single-term President until the Republicans cleaned up during his first midterm.
I'm trying to comprehend this, because I was not paying attention back in those days. But Clinton was doing bad? And some midterm results led him to shape-up ahead of re-election?
Or do I got that all wrong?
The biggest reason Trump lost in 2020 was the same biggest reason that Hilary lost in 2016... they both preached too much to their own choir. Hilary did not visit a lot of place and mostly preached to the large urban areas (and called people in other areas names). Trump preached to his base and did not account much at all for those in "the center" that voted for him in 2016.
Yea, he missed a lot of opportunities to connect with Americans. Bush & Obama talked to us a lot through special broadcasts from the oval office. Can a president just do those whenever he wants? Or does he need to have friends in the media? Trump did not do many of them (if any?)
But for Trump, had he not ruined his once impeccable reputation asthat way he'd still be able to help all of America, just in a AT>slightly smaller way.
president, he could have moved on and ran for congress in Florida, AT>and
It's really hard for someone, not affected by the extreme brainwashing in the USA, to understand that a single USAian cannot know how stupid and incompetent Trump was and still is.
Person, woman, man, camera, TV. Just saying...
His ratings were not great. Every time he would say something middle-of-the-road in the press, before you knew it Hillary would be giving her own soundbyte and often contradicting him with a more left-leaning opinion. For example, she contradicted him often when it came to universal health care and what type and size of employers might
be forced to provide it.
I am not 100% on how that works. I would guess that the White House announces that the President plans to address the Nation on a date and time, and then the networks decide if they are covering it.
On 06-14-22 07:24, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Question for Fox New <=-
know. They focused on the Trump group making claims that the election
was stolen, that Trump knew that his fraud statements were false but making them anyway, and as a side comment how Trump used the election fraud story to dupe $250,000,000 out of those who believed him. At
least some of that money went to various cronies -- but they did not say where most of it went.
Are any of those things illegal? What if the money went to attorney
fees?
I am not 100% on how that works. I would guess that the White House announces that the President plans to address the Nation on a date an time, and then the networks decide if they are covering it.That's what I always thought too, until now. Trump can't be that much of
a dummy that he just forgot to conduct those broadcasts.
His ratings were not great. Every time he would say something middle-of-the-road in the press, before you knew it Hillary would be giving her own soundbyte and often contradicting him with a more left-leaning opinion. For example, she contradicted him often when it came to universal health care and what type and size of employers might be forced to provide it.
Wow, so it sounds like there was a time when Hillary inadvertantly helped America. She should put that on her resume.
I am not 100% on how that works. I would guess that the White House announces that the President plans to address the Nation on a date and time, and then the networks decide if they are covering it.
That's what I always thought too, until now. Trump can't be that much of a dummy that he just forgot to conduct those broadcasts.
Trump did 26 in 4 years.He did do some,I am not 100% on how that works. I would guess that the White Hous announces that the President plans to address the Nation on a date time, and then the networks decide if they are covering it.That's what I always thought too, until now. Trump can't be that much of dummy that he just forgot to conduct those broadcasts.
but probably not as many as Obama,Obama did 20 in 8 years. <-- less than Trump's 26
Clinton,Clinton did 19 in 8 years. <-- less than Trump's 26
or anyoneIt only takes one to make your statement false but for completeness, here we go:
that came before them.
Maybe I have missed most of them, but Biden hasBiden has done 30 in ~2 years. <-- more than Trump's 26 in half the time
not done too many, either.
HouseI am not 100% on how that works. I would guess that the White
date anannounces that the President plans to address the Nation on a
time, and then the networks decide if they are covering it.
That's what I always thought too, until now. Trump can't be that muchof
a dummy that he just forgot to conduct those broadcasts.
They are referred to officially as "Address to the Nation," and apparently the President requests them. Obama requested 20 of the over two terms, and Trump requested 26 of them in one term:
They are referred to officially as "Address to the Nation," and appar the President requests them. Obama requested 20 of the over two terms Trump requested 26 of them in one term:The State of the Union is also an "Address to the Nation" - although
it can be a written statement handed to the Congress by a president.
As it is required by the US Constitution, every president has made
at least one. Except maybe for Zachary Taylor, who did not last long enough in office to have done so.
apparThey are referred to officially as "Address to the Nation," and
termsthe President requests them. Obama requested 20 of the over two
Trump requested 26 of them in one term:
The State of the Union is also an "Address to the Nation" - although
it can be a written statement handed to the Congress by a president.
As it is required by the US Constitution, every president has made
at least one. Except maybe for Zachary Taylor, who did not last long
enough in office to have done so.
The SOTU is technically an address to Congress, as mandated by the Constitution, while Addresses to the Nation are addresses to the people of the United States. As such, they are not synonymous, and one is not a subset
of the other. Addresses to the Nation are typically delivered from behind the
Resolute Desk, although Obama used other locations in the White House as well.
| Sysop: | Xerxes |
|---|---|
| Location: | Azle, Texas |
| Users: | 118 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 49:59:29 |
| Calls: | 3,013 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 154 |
| U/L today: |
0 files (0K bytes) |
| D/L today: |
0 files (0K bytes) |
| Messages: | 292,987 |
| Posted today: | 0 |