Remember when we used to tell ourselves that no two democracies have never
gone to war with one another?

The Russian invasion of Ukraine is just another example of this truism
actually being a falsism.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

Hello Jeff,

24 Feb 22 11:04, you wrote to All:

Remember when we used to tell ourselves that no two democracies have
never gone to war with one another?

The Russian invasion of Ukraine is just another example of this truism actually being a falsism.

yes, if you count russia as a democracy...

Regards,
--
dp

telnet://bbs.roonsbbs.hu:1212 <<=-

... 9:55pm up 6 days, 6:55:22, load: 76 processes, 278 threads.
--- GoldED/2 1.1.4.7+EMX
* Origin: Roon's BBS - Budapest, HUNGARY +36-1-4454412 (2:371/52)

Remember when we used to tell ourselves that no two democracies have never gone to war with one another?

I have never heard that.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine is just another example of this truism actually being a falsism.

I don't see Russia as any more of a "democracy" than I would see Nazi
Germany as a "democracy."


* SLMR 2.1a * Basic programmers never die, they gosub and don't return
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

24 Feb 22 11:04, you wrote to All:

Remember when we used to tell ourselves that no two democracies have never gone to war with one another?

The Russian invasion of Ukraine is just another example of this truism actually being a falsism.

yes, if you count russia as a democracy...

IIRC, I am pretty sure that Jeff-T usually refers to it as an oligarchy. I
was pretty shocked when he called it a democracy this time. :)


* SLMR 2.1a * # of Vulcans needed to replace a bulb? Precisely 1.000
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

On 24 Feb 2022, Mike Powell said the following...

Remember when we used to tell ourselves that no two democracies have nev gone to war with one another?

I have never heard that.

It was a common claim related to democracy being better than socialism/communism. A related claim is that no two countries that have McDonald's restaurants have ever gone to war with each other.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine is just another example of this truism actually being a falsism.

I don't see Russia as any more of a "democracy" than I would see Nazi Germany as a "democracy."

Their constitution claims that they are a democracy, and they do have public voting. That the same guy keeps winning is somewhat troublesome, though.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

On 24 Feb 2022, Mike Powell said the following...

The Russian invasion of Ukraine is just another example of this tru actually being a falsism.

yes, if you count russia as a democracy...

IIRC, I am pretty sure that Jeff-T usually refers to it as an oligarchy.
I was pretty shocked when he called it a democracy this time. :)

I don't recall saying that, but I have read it. I think I would be more likely to refer to it as an authoritarian democracy or a dictatorship.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

On 24 Feb 2022, Mike Powell said the following...

Remember when we used to tell ourselves that no two democracies have nev gone to war with one another?

I have never heard that.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine is just another example of this truism actually being a falsism.

I don't see Russia as any more of a "democracy" than I would see Nazi Germany as a "democracy."

According to a claim made by Senator(!) Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) today, the reason that Putin invaded Ukraine was in order to steal Ukraine's farmlands. Why does Russia need farmlands, you might ask? Well, according to Tuberville, it's because "[Putin] can't feed his people. It's a communist country, so he can't feed his people, so they need more farmland."

This is one of the people charting the future of our country.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

Hello Daniel,

Remember when we used to tell ourselves that no two democracies have
never gone to war with one another?

The Russian invasion of Ukraine is just another example of this truism
actually being a falsism.

yes, if you count russia as a democracy...

Trump does.

--Lee

--
I won't fan the flames of hate, ~Joe Biden

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
* Origin: news://eljaco.se:4119 (2:203/2)

Mike Powell wrote to JEFF THIELE <=-

Remember when we used to tell ourselves that no two democracies have never gone to war with one another?

I have never heard that.

Only Lefties heard of it. The rest of us live in the real world where such sayings are laughed at.

I don't see Russia as any more of a "democracy" than I would see Nazi Germany as a "democracy."

Lefties change the definition of words to match their current delusion. They have no concept of what a "democracy" is. To them, "democracy" is just a label the put on things to make them sound better.

Sort of like how they keep saying that "Democratic Socialism" is somehow different from non-democratic socialism.


... I gave up on my wife, and married my computer.
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/09/29 (Linux/64)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)

On 25 Feb 2022, Ron L. said the following...

Remember when we used to tell ourselves that no two democracies have ne gone to war with one another?

I have never heard that.

Only Lefties heard of it. The rest of us live in the real world where such sayings are laughed at.

I have heard it many times from conservatives. It was more prominent in
during the Cold War.

I don't see Russia as any more of a "democracy" than I would see Nazi Germany as a "democracy."

Lefties change the definition of words to match their current delusion. They have no concept of what a "democracy" is. To them, "democracy" is just a label the put on things to make them sound better.

Sort of like how they keep saying that "Democratic Socialism" is somehow different from non-democratic socialism.

George Orwell, a self-described democratic socialist and anti-communist,
would have a thing or two to say about that.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

yes, if you count russia as a democracy...

IIRC, I am pretty sure that Jeff-T usually refers to it as an oligarchy. I was pretty shocked when he called it a democracy this time. :)

I don't recall saying that, but I have read it. I think I would be more likely
to refer to it as an authoritarian democracy or a dictatorship.

I stand corrected, and agree.


* SLMR 2.1a * */ --Tribble with a lightsaber
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

I don't see Russia as any more of a "democracy" than I would see Nazi Germany as a "democracy."

According to a claim made by Senator(!) Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) today, the reason that Putin invaded Ukraine was in order to steal Ukraine's farmlands. Why does Russia need farmlands, you might ask? Well, according to Tuberville, it's because "[Putin] can't feed his people. It's a communist country, so he can't feed his people, so they need more farmland."

This is one of the people charting the future of our country.

He was the football coach at Auburn, which is also called Moo Cow U, so
what do you expect? :) While obviously an incorrect statement, on the surface, Russia sure has been acting more like the old USSR lately that the mistake could be easier to make.


* SLMR 2.1a * ADVENTURE: The land between entertainment and panic.
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

According to a claim made by Senator(!) Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) today,
the reason that Putin invaded Ukraine was in order to steal Ukraine's farmlands. Why does Russia need farmlands, you might ask? Well,
according to Tuberville, it's because "[Putin] can't feed his people.
It's a communist country, so he can't feed his people, so they need more farmland."

That's not as far off as John Kerry's "I hope Putin will still focus on climate change." (Doesn't look like Putin's interested right now.)

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64)
* Origin: CompuBBS | Ashburn VA | cfbbs.scinet-ftn.org (1:275/99)

On 25 Feb 2022, Mike Powell said the following...

According to a claim made by Senator(!) Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) today, t reason that Putin invaded Ukraine was in order to steal Ukraine's farmla Why does Russia need farmlands, you might ask? Well, according to Tuberv it's because "[Putin] can't feed his people. It's a communist country, s can't feed his people, so they need more farmland."

This is one of the people charting the future of our country.

He was the football coach at Auburn, which is also called Moo Cow U, so what do you expect? :) While obviously an incorrect statement, on the surface, Russia sure has been acting more like the old USSR lately that the mistake could be easier to make.

Hmm. Claiming the right to annex bordering lands by force sounds a lot like "Manifest Destiny" to me. Starting wars to gain territory is not specific to any ideology, nor is any ideology immune to it.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

On 25 Feb 2022, Aaron Thomas said the following...

According to a claim made by Senator(!) Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) today the reason that Putin invaded Ukraine was in order to steal Ukraine's farmlands. Why does Russia need farmlands, you might ask? Well, according to Tuberville, it's because "[Putin] can't feed his people. It's a communist country, so he can't feed his people, so they need m farmland."

That's not as far off as John Kerry's "I hope Putin will still focus on climate change." (Doesn't look like Putin's interested right now.)

Not really. Tuberville made a major mistake as compared to Kerry's statement
of hope. Nice try at a tit-for-tat, but no.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

He was the football coach at Auburn, which is also called Moo Cow U, so what do you expect? :) While obviously an incorrect statement, on the surface, Russia sure has been acting more like the old USSR lately that the mistake could be easier to make.

Hmm. Claiming the right to annex bordering lands by force sounds a lot like "Manifest Destiny" to me. Starting wars to gain territory is not specific to any ideology, nor is any ideology immune to it.

The difference I would see here is that we are talking soverign nations
(what Russia is doing) vs. territories held by foreign lands. I would
agree that no ideology is immune, but Russia's leader has been acting more
like a dictator (something that the USSR had, and most communist nations
have had) than anything else.


* SLMR 2.1a * alnal nathrak uth vaas bethud dothiel dienve
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

According to a claim made by Senator(!) Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) today, the reason that Putin invaded Ukraine was in order to steal Ukraine's farmlands. Why does Russia need farmlands, you might ask? Well, according to Tuberville, it's because "[Putin] can't feed his people. It's a communist country, so he can't feed his people, so they need more farmland."

That's not as far off as John Kerry's "I hope Putin will still focus on climat
change." (Doesn't look like Putin's interested right now.)

Hoping that a leader like Putin will focus on climate change is like hoping there is a Tooth Fairy or Santa Claus.


* SLMR 2.1a * "I'd like to buy a schwa, Pat."
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

According to a claim made by Senator(!) Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) toda
the reason that Putin invaded Ukraine was in order to steal Ukraine'
farmlands. Why does Russia need farmlands, you might ask? Well, according to Tuberville, it's because "[Putin] can't feed his people
It's a communist country, so he can't feed his people, so they need farmland."

That's not as far off as John Kerry's "I hope Putin will still focus on climate change." (Doesn't look like Putin's interested right now.)

Not really. Tuberville made a major mistake as compared to Kerry's statement of hope. Nice try at a tit-for-tat, but no.

I don't know about that. You seem smart enough to realize that hoping for Putin to focus on climate change is silly talk. Mistaking Putin for a communist-era dictator is not too far off the mark considering his actions. I will give you that Tommy was certainly alive when the USSR fell apart and should remember that. It was a pretty big deal, after all!


* SLMR 2.1a * If you believe in telekinesis, please raise my hand.
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

On 26 Feb 2022, Mike Powell said the following...

He was the football coach at Auburn, which is also called Moo Cow U what do you expect? :) While obviously an incorrect statement, on surface, Russia sure has been acting more like the old USSR lately the mistake could be easier to make.

Hmm. Claiming the right to annex bordering lands by force sounds a lot l "Manifest Destiny" to me. Starting wars to gain territory is not specifi any ideology, nor is any ideology immune to it.

The difference I would see here is that we are talking soverign nations (what Russia is doing) vs. territories held by foreign lands. I would agree that no ideology is immune, but Russia's leader has been acting
more like a dictator (something that the USSR had, and most communist nations have had) than anything else.

The only difference between a sovereign nation and a territory held by
foreign lands would seem to be the aggressor's opinion on whether the
foreign land being invaded has the right to consider itself a sovereign
nation.

Take, for instance, the US Cuvil War.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

On 26 Feb 2022, Mike Powell said the following...

That's not as far off as John Kerry's "I hope Putin will still focu climate change." (Doesn't look like Putin's interested right now.)

Not really. Tuberville made a major mistake as compared to Kerry's state of hope. Nice try at a tit-for-tat, but no.

I don't know about that. You seem smart enough to realize that hoping
for Putin to focus on climate change is silly talk. Mistaking Putin for
a communist-era dictator is not too far off the mark considering his actions. I will give you that Tommy was certainly alive when the USSR fell apart and should remember that. It was a pretty big deal, after
all!

I'm smart enough to realize that Kerry's statement was an opinion, while Tuberville's was offered as fact.

Climate change is Kerry's bailiwick. Of course he's going to hope that Putin will keep Russia focused on reducing climate change even as he wages war.
Wars in general are not very environmentally friendly, but the vast majority
of Russia is not directly affected by the war. Sanctions might make it very difficult to keep up with climate change efforts, though.

Tuberville is one of just 100 people in the US Senate. He should know basic facts about the major countries of the world. In this case, his
misinformation was also used as a building block to (incorrectly) explain the reason Russia invaded Ukraine. US policy is dependent on correct information, whether Tuberville writes legislation or simply votes on it.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

On 25 Feb 2022, Aaron Thomas said the following...

According to a claim made by Senator(!) Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) today the reason that Putin invaded Ukraine was in order to steal Ukraine's farmlands. Why does Russia need farmlands, you might ask? Well, according to Tuberville, it's because "[Putin] can't feed his people. It's a communist country, so he can't feed his people, so they need m farmland."

That's not as far off as John Kerry's "I hope Putin will still focus on climate change." (Doesn't look like Putin's interested right now.)

And why is Trump, the man who you've described as the "greatest president of your lifetime" and the man who, were it not for around seven million votes
and one cowardly VP, would be president *right now*, praising Putin as this
is happening?

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

And why is Trump, the man who you've described as the "greatest president of
your lifetime" and the man who, were it not for around seven million votes and one cowardly VP, would be president *right now*, praising Putin as this
is happening?

It takes a Stable Genius to call Putin a Savvy Genius.

For a century, the US citizens have been indoctrinated to believe that socialism is evil, and communism in particular is hell. And now, after having "elected" (after manipulating an election that he lost by three million votes) a useful idiot, that time after time openly has declared his love for and admiration of a ruthless dictator who openly has declared that his goal is to establish Soviet Union II, said idiot's faithful followers praise Russia.

And on Fox News those followers keep praising this ruthless dictator and call those who try to help the European country, that has been violated, weak. And they can't even see the irony of it all? Not so good old Joseph McCarthy is probably turning in his grave...

Oh, the stupidity of it all. But I guess, to blindly follow a leader with the IQ of a toddler you must be even dumber than that.



..

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125
* Origin: news://eljaco.se:4119 (2:203/2)

And why is Trump, the man who you've described as the "greatest
president of your lifetime" and the man who, were it not for around
seven million votes and one cowardly VP, would be president *right now*, praising Putin as this is happening?

I don't see Trump praising Putin. He just condemned the invasion of Ukraine earlier today during his CPAC speech.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64)
* Origin: CompuBBS | Ashburn VA | cfbbs.scinet-ftn.org (1:275/99)

Hello Aaron,

And why is Trump, the man who you've described as the "greatest
president of your lifetime" and the man who, were it not for around
seven million votes and one cowardly VP, would be president *right now*,
praising Putin as this is happening?

I don't see Trump praising Putin. He just condemned the invasion of Ukraine
earlier today during his CPAC speech.

Open your eyes -

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-praised-smart-putin-us-stupid -country-2022-2


Your dearly beloved Russian apologist said it out loud, to an audience
of 150 MAGAmaniacs in Florida, during his CPAC speech.

--Lee

--
Everybody Loves Our Buns

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
* Origin: news://eljaco.se:4119 (2:203/2)

on *25.02.22* at *6:20:57* You wrote in area *POLITICS*
to *Jeff Thiele* about *"Re: Russia and Ukraine"*.

According to a claim made by Senator(!) Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) today,
the reason that Putin invaded Ukraine was in order to steal Ukraine's
farmlands. Why does Russia need farmlands, you might ask? Well,
according to Tuberville, it's because "[Putin] can't feed his people.
It's a communist country, so he can't feed his people, so they need more
farmland."

That's not as far off as John Kerry's "I hope Putin will still focus on climate change." (Doesn't look like Putin's interested right now.)

Well, Stalin used Ukraine for its grain too, so I guess it's just the way Russian dictators look at it. Putin did say that Lenin and Stalin were "foolish" and "too soft."

--- WinPoint 400.2
* Origin: What's the Point (1:229/426.27)

On 27 Feb 2022, Aaron Thomas said the following...

And why is Trump, the man who you've described as the "greatest president of your lifetime" and the man who, were it not for around seven million votes and one cowardly VP, would be president *right no praising Putin as this is happening?

I don't see Trump praising Putin. He just condemned the invasion of Ukraine earlier today during his CPAC speech.

That you haven't seen him doing it doesn't mean he hasn't been doing it. And he's been doing it aplenty.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

And why is Trump, the man who you've described as the "greatest president of your lifetime" and the man who, were it not for around seven million votes and one cowardly VP, would be president *right now*, praising Putin as this is happening?

I don't see Trump praising Putin. He just condemned the invasion of Ukraine earlier today during his CPAC speech.

I agree. IMHO, he tried treating Putin more as an equal than an enemy,
where possible. I think Putin can see now that he can get away with
whatever he wants, although I am also starting to question how sound he is mentally. Most of what he has done over the past month has not made much sense.


* SLMR 2.1a * Peter Steele and Armand, vampire -- separated at birth?
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

Well, Stalin used Ukraine for its grain too, so I guess it's just the way Russi
n dictators look at it. Putin did say that Lenin and Stalin were "foolish" and
"too soft."

Saying that about Stalin says something about him. Stalin was at least as
bad as Hitler to his own people and the peoples of the places the USSR conquered.


* SLMR 2.1a * . Look in the mirror, my friend.... .
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

And why is Trump, the man who you've described as the "greatest
president of your lifetime" and the man who, were it not for around
seven million votes and one cowardly VP, would be president *right n
praising Putin as this is happening?

I don't see Trump praising Putin. He just condemned the invasion of Ukraine
earlier today during his CPAC speech.

Open your eyes -

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-praised-smart-putin-us-stupid

Trump was right. Putin is "smart," but that doesn't mean that he's a wonderful person. He's also right to say that "America has become a dumb country." It's because of Biden. He confuses the needs of his donors with the needs of his voters, and some day that greedy logic is going to catch up with all of us, and we will be the next Ukraine. (Keep a safe distance from DC & Delaware!)

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64)
* Origin: CompuBBS | Ashburn VA | cfbbs.scinet-ftn.org (1:275/99)

That you haven't seen him doing it doesn't mean he hasn't been doing it. And he's been doing it aplenty.

Which child molester from CNN provided you with that trustworthy news report?

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64)
* Origin: CompuBBS | Ashburn VA | cfbbs.scinet-ftn.org (1:275/99)

On 28 Feb 2022, Aaron Thomas said the following...

That you haven't seen him doing it doesn't mean he hasn't been doing And he's been doing it aplenty.

Which child molester from CNN provided you with that trustworthy news report?

It's a matter of public record at this point.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

Trump was right. Putin is "smart," but that doesn't mean that he's a wonderful
person. He's also right to say that "America has become a dumb country." It's because of Biden. He confuses the needs of his donors with the needs of his
voters, and some day that greedy logic is going to catch up with all of us, and
we will be the next Ukraine. (Keep a safe distance from DC & Delaware!)

Oh. My. God.

I know that the GOP for decades has been able to stifle any attempt to give the US children a fair and unbiased education, but I had no idea that the brainwashing had gone this far.

You, Sir, is a very good ambassador for the Neo-GOP movement. The movement that admires Putin in an absolutely unprecedented way, a movement that would have been absolutely unthinkable 50 years ago -- you probably would have been shot as a traitor by then...

BTW: Now that Ukraine has a Jewish president, where are all those Marjorie Taylor Greene's Jewish Space Lasers, now that they easily could destroy the kilometre long Russian convoys sent into Ukraine by your megalomaniac "savvy genius" <tm. Trump> hero?


..

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125
* Origin: news://eljaco.se:4119 (2:203/2)

Hello Aaron,

And why is Trump, the man who you've described as the "greatest
president of your lifetime" and the man who, were it not for

around

seven million votes and one cowardly VP, would be president

*right n

praising Putin as this is happening?

I don't see Trump praising Putin. He just condemned the invasion

of

Ukraine
earlier today during his CPAC speech.

Open your eyes -

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-praised-smart-putin-us-stupid

Trump was right.

Trump is a Russian apologist.

Putin is "smart," but that doesn't mean that he's a wonderful person.

Trump loves him. Nobody else does, including most Russians.
But Trump absolutely loves him. Putin is his kind of guy.

He's also right to say that "America has become a dumb country."

Like I said, Trump is a Russian apologist. Since you agree with
his views, that makes you one as well. Two peas in a pod. Maybe the
two of you can share a dacha in Moscow. But since Aeroflot has been
banned from our airspace, it looks like both you and Trump will have
to continue suffering here in the USA.

It's because of Biden.

Yep. All his fault. Imposing sanctions on Russia for invading a
sovereign independent democratic state. As millions of innocent
people flee for their lives, not knowing when if ever they will
be able to return, or if their loved ones left behind will even
survive.

Tune in on tonight's SOTU speech. President Biden will fill you
in on all the details ...

--Lee

--
I Take A Sheet In The Pool

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
* Origin: news://eljaco.se:4119 (2:203/2)

I don't see Trump praising Putin. He just condemned the invasion of Ukra earlier today during his CPAC speech.

I agree. IMHO, he tried treating Putin more as an equal than an enemy, where possible. I think Putin can see now that he can get away with whatever he wants, although I am also starting to question how sound he
is mentally. Most of what he has done over the past month has not made much sense.

I read an article suggesting that Putin has "pandemic anxiety" but I don't believe it. The media wants what Democrats want, and Democrats want Russia to prevail.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64)
* Origin: CompuBBS | Ashburn VA | cfbbs.scinet-ftn.org (1:275/99)

On 03-01-22 03:22, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Mike Powell about Re: Russia and Ukraine <=-

I read an article suggesting that Putin has "pandemic anxiety" but I
don't believe it.

The media wants what Democrats want, and Democrats
want Russia to prevail.

Where on earth did you pull that fake opinion from?

Dale Shipp
fido_261_1466 (at) verizon (dot) net
(1:261/1466)



... Shipwrecked in Silver Spring, Maryland. 00:37:03, 02 Mar 2022
___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30

--- Maximus/NT 3.01
* Origin: Owl's Anchor (1:261/1466)

On 2022 Mar 01 03:22:06, you wrote to Mike Powell:

[...] and Democrats want Russia to prevail.

bullshit.

)\/(ark

"The soul of a small kitten in the body of a mighty dragon. Look on my majesty, ye mighty, and despair! Or bring me catnip. Your choice. Oooh, a shiny thing!"
... Smile! It makes people wonder what you're up to ;*)
---
* Origin: (1:3634/12.73)

Hello mark,

[...] and Democrats want Russia to prevail.

bullshit.

Russia did prevail in unifying a country. Didn't you notice
all those people waving blue and yellow flags?

--Lee

--
Coronovirus doesn't effect rats n snakes so most of u are safe.

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
* Origin: news://eljaco.se:4119 (2:203/2)

I know that the GOP for decades has been able to stifle any attempt
to give the US children a fair and unbiased education, but I had no idea that the brainwashing had gone this far.

For decades eh? This BS just started happening recently. It's not the GOP trying to change education, it's leftist lunatics like Gavin Newsome. Everything is biased in case you didn't notice. A new bias doesn't fix an old one.

All the race talk is BS that needs to stop, but that can only happen after a couple more Joe-lections.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64)
* Origin: CompuBBS | Ashburn VA | cfbbs.scinet-ftn.org (1:275/99)

Trump is a Russian apologist.

Biden's apologizing for them now. He knows that they're killing children, but yet he continues to purchase Russian natural gas.

Do you know what Trump did to Putin's cousin in Syria when he (Assad) was killing children?

All Biden knows how to do is kill children (Afghanistan) and support others
who kill children by purchasing their natural gas (Russia.)

It's because of Biden.

Yep. All his fault. Imposing sanctions on Russia for invading a
sovereign independent democratic state. As millions of innocent
people flee for their lives, not knowing when if ever they will
be able to return, or if their loved ones left behind will even
survive.

Joe funded Russia's invasion on Ukraine by cancelling American energy production, and he continues to import Putin's energy despite all the dead children. Look at the monsters the media has you defending! Just because he doesn't want to be 'wrong' about his opposition to increasing energy
production at home.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64)
* Origin: CompuBBS | Ashburn VA | cfbbs.scinet-ftn.org (1:275/99)

The media wants what Democrats want, and Democrats
want Russia to prevail.

Where on earth did you pull that fake opinion from?

Biden can curb the invasion by stopping the gas purchases, but he won't do it because he doesn't want the price to soar ahead of election day, and he also don't want to increase stateside production because that would disrupt the "Destroy America" campaign, plus he'd have to admit to Trump being right about stateside production.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64)
* Origin: CompuBBS | Ashburn VA | cfbbs.scinet-ftn.org (1:275/99)

[...] and Democrats want Russia to prevail.

bullshit.

They totally do. Russia will prevail, and we're number 3 on the invasion list.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64)
* Origin: CompuBBS | Ashburn VA | cfbbs.scinet-ftn.org (1:275/99)

Biden can curb the invasion by stopping the gas purchases,

Yeah, right. So you actually believe that the USA buy *gas* from Russia? How many of the likes of you can there be?

Oh. My. God. The USA don't even buy *oil* from Russia any more -- did Fox News forget to mention that?

Sigh... I think I give up. Happy Putin ass-licking to all of you MAGA soldiers. After all, you already have several elected leaders and media stars that are up for the Lenin Medal of Honour.



..

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101125
* Origin: news://eljaco.se:4119 (2:203/2)

Aaron Thomas wrote to Björn Felten <=-

I know that the GOP for decades has been able to stifle any attempt
to give the US children a fair and unbiased education, but I had no idea that the brainwashing had gone this far.

For decades eh? This BS just started happening recently. It's not the
GOP trying to change education, it's leftist lunatics like Gavin
Newsome. Everything is biased in case you didn't notice. A new bias doesn't fix an old one.

Remember that Lefties always accuse their opponents of what they actually do.


... Santa uses 'The Club' in New York, a vest in Florida.
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/09/29 (Linux/64)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)

The media wants what Democrats want, and Democrats
want Russia to prevail.

Where on earth did you pull that fake opinion from?

Biden can curb the invasion by stopping the gas purchases, but he won't do it because he doesn't want the price to soar ahead of election day, and he also don't want to increase stateside production because that would disrupt the "Destroy America" campaign, plus he'd have to admit to Trump being right about
stateside production.

With the way things are going, after the mid-terms, he may decide he wants
to ramp production back up to help his re-election chances. Some citizens
have short memories, while others of us won't be in that group.


* SLMR 2.1a * Acid absorbs 10 times its weight in excess reality.
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

Biden can curb the invasion by stopping the gas purchases, but he won't
do it because he doesn't want the price to soar ahead of election day,
and he also don't want to increase stateside production because that
would disrupt the "Destroy America" campaign, plus he'd have to admit to Trump being right about stateside production.

What 'election day' is everyone talking about? Surely not 2024??



|07p|15AULIE|1142|07o
|08.........

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A47 2021/12/24 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: 2o fOr beeRS bbS>>20ForBeers.com:1337 (1:105/420)

On 03-02-22 22:19, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Russia and Ukraine <=-

The media wants what Democrats want, and Democrats
want Russia to prevail.

Where on earth did you pull that fake opinion from?

Biden can curb the invasion by stopping the gas purchases,

Except sanctions against Russian energy exports are "on the table" and
may well be imposed as time goes on. In any case, they would have
little impact on energy imports.

From -- https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/3/3/how-much-oil-does-the-us-import-from-russia:

In 2021, the US imported an average of 209,000 barrels per day (bpd) of
crude oil and 500,000 bpd of other petroleum products from Russia,
according to the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM)
trade association.

This represented three percent of US crude oil imports and one percent
of the total crude oil processed by US refineries. By contrast, the US
imported 61 percent of its crude oil from Canada, 10 percent from
Mexico, and six percent from Saudi Arabia in the same year.


and from -- https://observer.com/2022/02/russia-ukraine-war-affect-oil-gas-price-us-consumer/:

Only 7 percent of the U.S.'s total oil imports come from Russia, and the
U.S. imports no natural gas from there, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

but he
won't do it because he doesn't want the price to soar ahead of election day,

But he is releasing oil reserves to help stabilize gas prices.

and he also don't want to increase stateside production because
that would disrupt the "Destroy America" campaign, plus he'd have to
admit to Trump being right about stateside production.

There is no Destroy America campaign except in the mind of Trump and
his acolytes.


Dale Shipp
fido_261_1466 (at) verizon (dot) net
(1:261/1466)


... Shipwrecked in Silver Spring, Maryland. 01:30:15, 04 Mar 2022
___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30

--- Maximus/NT 3.01
* Origin: Owl's Anchor (1:261/1466)

Biden can curb the invasion by stopping the gas purchases, but he won do it because he doesn't want the price to soar ahead of election day and he also don't want to increase stateside production because that would disrupt the "Destroy America" campaign, plus he'd have to admit Trump being right about stateside production.

What 'election day' is everyone talking about? Surely not 2024??

The 2022 election. There are US senate races that can easily give senate Republicans their majority back.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Linux/64)
* Origin: CompuBBS | Ashburn VA | cfbbs.scinet-ftn.org (1:275/99)

Björn Felten wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-

Biden can curb the invasion by stopping the gas purchases,

Yeah, right. So you actually believe that the USA buy *gas* from Russia? How many of the likes of you can there be?

Oh. My. God. The USA don't even buy *oil* from Russia any more --
did Fox News forget to mention that?

Sigh... I think I give up. Happy Putin ass-licking to all of you
MAGA soldiers. After all, you already have several elected leaders and media stars that are up for the Lenin Medal of Honour.

"House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she supports banning all Russian oil to the United States amid growing momentum in Congress to find additional ways to cut off revenue streams to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

"I'm all for that. Ban it," Pelosi said Thursday at a press conference at the Capitol.

Bipartisan members of Congress have been pushing legislation to ban oil imports from Russia and Republicans, especially, have been calling for more domestic oil and gas production in the wake of Russia's ongoing assault on Ukraine.

The most recent data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration show that in December, the U.S. imported 405,000 barrels per day of crude oil and petroleum products from Russia or almost 5% of all U.S. imports for the month."


... "Remember what the doormouse said: Feed Your Head."
--- MultiMail/Win v0.52
* Origin: Platinum Xpress Support 305-248-7815 (1:218/602)

Hello Thumper,

Biden can curb the invasion by stopping the gas purchases,

There is oil. And there is gas.

Yeah, right. So you actually believe that the USA buy *gas* from
Russia? How many of the likes of you can there be?

The USA buys lots of stuff that is on the world market.
And there is some stuff from Russia on the world market.

Oh. My. God. The USA don't even buy *oil* from Russia any more --
did Fox News forget to mention that?

Although the USA has the capability to produce far more oil
domestically than it does now, it still remains dependent on
importing oil - including about 7 percent from Russia.

Sigh... I think I give up. Happy Putin ass-licking to all of you
MAGA soldiers. After all, you already have several elected leaders and
media stars that are up for the Lenin Medal of Honour.

"House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she supports banning all Russian oil to the
United States amid growing momentum in Congress to find additional ways to cut off revenue streams to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Hooray for Nancy! What a gal!

"I'm all for that. Ban it," Pelosi said Thursday at a press conference at the Capitol.

You tell 'em, girl!

Bipartisan members of Congress have been pushing legislation to ban oil imports from Russia and Republicans, especially, have been calling for more odomestic il and gas production in the wake of Russia's ongoing assault on Ukraine.

Joe Biden (D-WV) and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) already have in the Senate.
And with Nancy Pelosi on board in the House, it won't be long before
the Congress has a bill on Biden's desk.

The most recent data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration show that in December, the U.S. imported 405,000 barrels per day of crude oil and
petroleum products from Russia or almost 5% of all U.S. imports for the month."

For the month. The percentage varies depending on time of year.

--Lee

--
Often Licked, Never Beaten

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
* Origin: news://eljaco.se:4119 (2:203/2)

on *28.02.22* at *21:38:00* You wrote in area *POLITICS*
to *AARON THOMAS* about *"Re: Russia and Ukraine"*.

I don't see Trump praising Putin. He just condemned the invasion of
Ukraine earlier today during his CPAC speech.

I agree. IMHO, he tried treating Putin more as an equal than an enemy, where possible. I think Putin can see now that he can get away with whatever he wants, although I am also starting to question how sound he
is
mentally. Most of what he has done over the past month has not made much sense.

What everyone expected was for Putin to invade the two eastern areas which were controlled by Russian Seperatists. Putin originally said that he declared those sections to be sovereign entities, and since the people controlling those entities wanted Russia to come in and assume control, it was a way for Putin to say that he wasn't invading Ukraine.

His actions since then make no sense whatsoever, unless you consider the speech he gave the day before the invasion, where he basically told us that he wanted to rebuild the Soviet empire, and said that Lenin and Stalin were foolish and too soft.

--- WinPoint 400.2
* Origin: What's the Point (1:229/426.27)

on *28.02.22* at *21:39:00* You wrote in area *POLITICS*
to *AL THOMPSON* about *"Russia and Ukraine"*.

Well, Stalin used Ukraine for its grain too, so I guess it's just the

way Russi

n dictators look at it. Putin did say that Lenin and Stalin were "foolish" and
"too soft."

Saying that about Stalin says something about him. Stalin was at least
as
bad as Hitler to his own people and the peoples of the places the USSR conquered.

Well, Hitler killed about 12 million, Stalin killed about 20. Mao still holds the record at 60 million. But the fact that Putin thinks Stalin was "too soft" is rather chilling.

--- WinPoint 400.2
* Origin: What's the Point (1:229/426.27)

Hello Mike,

And why is Trump, the man who you've described as the "greatest
president of your lifetime" and the man who, were it not for around
seven million votes and one cowardly VP, would be president *right

now*,

praising Putin as this is happening?

I don't see Trump praising Putin. He just condemned the invasion of
Ukraine
earlier today during his CPAC speech.

I agree. IMHO, he tried treating Putin more as an equal than an enemy, where possible.

Trump got impeached for withholding military aid to strong-arm
Ukrainian President Zelensky. Trump continues to praise Putin as
the man he loves, calling Putin "savvy" and "genius" for his
invasion of Ukraine.

A real patriotic son of a bitch.

1.5+ refugees from Ukraine (mostly woman and children) fleeing
into other countries. Just to stay alive. Leaving behind men they
know will probably die at the hands of a ruthless dictator.

The number of refugees will continue to climb. And then they
will stop, and the numbers of Ukrainians inside of Ukraine will
dwindle to being nothing.

I think Putin can see now that he can get away with whatever he wants,

Except for one problem with your nutty analaysis - Joe Biden stepped
in Putin's way. Now Putin is faced with a strong US President, and a
unified NATO, along with a real army in Ukraine that is giving the
Russian madman more than a black eye ...

although I am also starting to question how sound he is mentally.

Putin has always been a killer. A deeply paranoid megalomaniac, but
always a killer.

Most of what he has done over the past month has not made much
sense.

It makes sense to him.

--Lee

--
Impossible is nothing

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
* Origin: news://eljaco.se:4119 (2:203/2)

Hello Mike,

Well, Stalin used Ukraine for its grain too, so I guess it's just the

way Russi

n dictators look at it. Putin did say that Lenin and Stalin were

"foolish" and

"too soft."

Saying that about Stalin says something about him. Stalin was at least as bad as Hitler to his own people and the peoples of the places the USSR conquered.

FDR and Winston Churchill both got along fine with Stalin. All three
of them hated Hitler. Fortunately, the Nazi leader left the building
shortly after Truman took office, thus saving the people of Berlin
and Germany the same fate as Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

--Lee

--
Hey hey! Ho ho! Donald Trump has got to go!

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
* Origin: news://eljaco.se:4119 (2:203/2)

Saying that about Stalin says something about him. Stalin was at least as
bad as Hitler to his own people and the peoples of the places the USSR conquered.

Well, Hitler killed about 12 million, Stalin killed about 20. Mao still holds
he record at 60 million. But the fact that Putin thinks Stalin was "too soft"
s rather chilling.

It is indeed. Stalin was anything but soft.


* SLMR 2.1a * This sentence is a !!! premature punctuator
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

on *01.03.22* at *20:01:00* You wrote in area *POLITICS*
to *Aaron Thomas* about *"Russia and Ukraine"*.

Trump loves him. Nobody else does, including most Russians. But Trump absolutely loves him. Putin is his kind of guy.

I don't think Trump LIKES him, but Putin is "his kind of guy." Consider that Trump was a life-long Democrat supporter and donor, was a real estate "tycoon" in one of the most corrupt Democrat-run cities, and being a real estate developer had to have "special arrangements" with the corrupt unions in NYC to get anything done. In other words, an "oligarch."


--- WinPoint 400.2
* Origin: What's the Point (1:229/426.27)

Hello Al,

Trump loves him. Nobody else does, including most Russians. But Trump
absolutely loves him. Putin is his kind of guy.

I don't think Trump LIKES him, but Putin is "his kind of guy."

Trump has been singing all praise and glory to his name.
That not just liking the guy, but showing love and adoration.
That is a level of sickness that not even the best shrinks
can describe.

Consider that Trump was a life-long Democrat supporter and donor, was a real
estate "tycoon" in one of the most corrupt Democrat-run cities, and being a
real estate developer had to have "special arrangements" with the corrupt unions in NYC to get anything done. In other words, an "oligarch."

The fact that Trump is a poor businessman and has gone bankrupt
at least four times has nothing to do with Democrats or unions or
whoever runs NYC.

--Lee

--
There's no split in Cremo.

--- MesNews/1.08.05.00-gb
* Origin: news://eljaco.se:4119 (2:203/2)

on *13.03.22* at *15:37:29* You wrote in area *POLITICS*
to *Al Thompson* about *"Russia and Ukraine"*.

Consider that Trump was a life-long Democrat supporter and donor, was a
real estate "tycoon" in one of the most corrupt Democrat-run cities, and
being a real estate developer had to have "special arrangements" with
the corrupt
unions in NYC to get anything done. In other words, an "oligarch."

The fact that Trump is a poor businessman and has gone bankrupt at least four times has nothing to do with Democrats or unions or whoever runs
NYC.

You are confusing a "successfull businessman" with "someone who runs a successful business."

The Wall Street investment goons regularly buy existing thriving businesses, extract all possible capital out of them, leverage it to obtain other financing,
then dump it (Bain Capital is a good example of this). The business fails into bankruptcy, and the investors get to right off the "loss" on their taxes, and businessmen make billions. The businessmen are successful, since their only goal is to make as much short term profit as possible.

A person who runs a successful business is someone who builds a long term business that seeks to be as stable as possible and employ as many people as possible.


--- WinPoint 400.2
* Origin: What's the Point (1:229/426.27)

Al Thompson wrote to Lee Lofaso <=-

You are confusing a "successfull businessman" with "someone who runs a successful business."

The Wall Street investment goons regularly buy existing thriving businesses, extract all possible capital out of them, leverage it to obtain other financing,
then dump it (Bain Capital is a good example of this). The business fails into bankruptcy, and the investors get to right off the "loss" on their taxes, and businessmen make billions. The businessmen are successful, since their only goal is to make as much short term profit
as possible.

A person who runs a successful business is someone who builds a long
term business that seeks to be as stable as possible and employ as many people as possible.

Remember that Lefties only know how to destroy things. So "successfull businessman" and "someone who runs a successful business" are identical in their minds.

They cannot comprehend someone who does not destroy.


... How do you keep a turkey in suspense?
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/09/29 (Linux/64)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)

On 15 Mar 2022, Ron L. said the following...

Remember that Lefties only know how to destroy things. So "successfull businessman" and "someone who runs a successful business" are identical
in their minds.

<Squawk!> Lefties always this! <Squawk!> Lefties always that! <Squawk!>

Your asinine generalizations mean nothing, Ron.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

<Squawk!> Lefties always this! <Squawk!> Lefties always that! <Squawk!>

Your asinine generalizations mean nothing, Ron.

Jeff, need I remind you again how it feels when people treat your opinions
like that? Has it really been that long since the last time? (o_O)

Play nice, please. Act like a school-yard bully, and *this* bully's gonna school ya. (^_^)

McDoob
SysOp, PiBBS
pibbs.sytes.net

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: PiBBS (1:229/110)

On 15 Mar 2022, Shaun Buzza said the following...

<Squawk!> Lefties always this! <Squawk!> Lefties always that! <Squawk

Your asinine generalizations mean nothing, Ron.

Jeff, need I remind you again how it feels when people treat your
opinions like that? Has it really been that long since the last time? (o_O)

When Ron stops making vague generalizations, I'll stop mocking him for parroting vague generalizations.

Play nice, please. Act like a school-yard bully, and *this* bully's gonna school ya. (^_^)

Yeah, whatever.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

Jeff, need I remind you again how it feels when people treat your opinions like that? Has it really been that long since the last time? (o_O)

When Ron stops making vague generalizations, I'll stop mocking him for parroting vague generalizations.

Play nice, please. Act like a school-yard bully, and *this* bully's g school ya. (^_^)

Yeah, whatever.

Here's another vague generalization: trolls are bad, mm-kay?

Lighten up, brother, and your life gets brighter! (^_^)

Have a great day!

McDoob
SysOp, PiBBS
pibbs.sytes.net

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: PiBBS (1:229/110)

On 15 Mar 2022, Shaun Buzza said the following...

Jeff, need I remind you again how it feels when people treat you opinions like that? Has it really been that long since the last (o_O)

When Ron stops making vague generalizations, I'll stop mocking him fo parroting vague generalizations.

Play nice, please. Act like a school-yard bully, and *this* bull school ya. (^_^)

Yeah, whatever.

Here's another vague generalization: trolls are bad, mm-kay?

Indeed, so don't be one.

Lighten up, brother, and your life gets brighter! (^_^)

My life is plenty bright.

However, if we're going to have intelligent and reasonable discussion here, there's no place for vague (and false) generalizations about those on the opposite side of the political 50-yard-line.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

Here's another vague generalization: trolls are bad, mm-kay?

Indeed, so don't be one.

A clear case of a pot calling the kettle black, if ever I've seen it...

However, if we're going to have intelligent and reasonable discussion here, there's no place for vague (and false) generalizations about those on the opposite side of the political 50-yard-line.

There's also no place for

<Squawk!>Lefties always this!<Squawk!>Lefties always that!<Squawk!>

ridiculing the opinions or statements of those on *your* opposite side. I will have to look back on this thread to see what specific generalizations you're referring to. The only thing I noticed was you, being a bit of a jerk...again...

I was only trying to give you a (sort of) friendly reminder that...well... trolls are bad, mmkay?

Enjoy your day! (^_^)

McDoob
SysOp, PiBBS
pibbs.sytes.net

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: PiBBS (1:229/110)

On 15 Mar 2022, Shaun Buzza said the following...

Here's another vague generalization: trolls are bad, mm-kay?

Indeed, so don't be one.

A clear case of a pot calling the kettle black, if ever I've seen it...

Indeed, so don't be do that.

However, if we're going to have intelligent and reasonable discussion here, there's no place for vague (and false) generalizations about th on the opposite side of the political 50-yard-line.

There's also no place for

<Squawk!>Lefties always this!<Squawk!>Lefties always that!<Squawk!>

Sure there is. If Ron has a problem with it, Ron can bring it up with me directly.

ridiculing the opinions or statements of those on *your* opposite side.
I will have to look back on this thread to see what specific generalizations you're referring to. The only thing I noticed was you, being a bit of a jerk...again...

Yeah... You should definitely know what you're talking about before
criticising others. "Before" being the key word.

Opposing sides can have valid opposing views, but mischaracterizing the other side to fit some cartoon image of themselves is not a valid view and
definitely worthy of ridicule.

Perhaps you should take good advice and not worry your blessed little heart about who is and isn't a troll.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

Here's another vague generalization: trolls are bad, mm-kay

Indeed, so don't be one.

A clear case of a pot calling the kettle black, if ever I've seen it.

Indeed, so don't be do that.

Indeed, so don't be a pot...or a kettle...or...whatever...

McDoob
SysOp, PiBBS
pibbs.sytes.net

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: PiBBS (1:229/110)

However, if we're going to have intelligent and reasonable discu here, there's no place for vague (and false) generalizations abo on the opposite side of the political 50-yard-line.

There's also no place for

<Squawk!>Lefties always this!<Squawk!>Lefties always that!<Squaw

Sure there is. If Ron has a problem with it, Ron can bring it up with me directly.

*I* have a problem with it. And I *am* bringing it up with you directly, in case you hadn't noticed.

ridiculing the opinions or statements of those on *your* opposite sid I will have to look back on this thread to see what specific generalizations you're referring to. The only thing I noticed was you being a bit of a jerk...again...

Yeah... You should definitely know what you're talking about before criticising others. "Before" being the key word.

I do know what I'm talking about: you being a bit of a jerk...still...

Opposing sides can have valid opposing views, but mischaracterizing the other side to fit some cartoon image of themselves is not a valid view
and definitely worthy of ridicule.

But mischaracterizing the other side as a parrot is different? You, sir, are worthy of ridicule, too! Yet, for the most part, you are not being ridiculed, despite your own ridiculous ridiculing of others!

Perhaps you should take good advice and not worry your blessed little heart about who is and isn't a troll.

Thank you for the blessing, but there is nothing about me that can be
described as 'little', except the amount of remaining hair on my scalp. Second least of all, my heart. Go ahead, ask which is first least! (o_-)

Perhaps you should take good advice and lighten the [bleep] up! Smile a
little! Don't worry, if it breaks your face, I'll pay for the surgery! I'm
nice that way!

Please continue enjoying your day!

McDoob
SysOp, PiBBS
pibbs.sytes.net

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: PiBBS (1:229/110)

On 15 Mar 2022, Shaun Buzza said the following...

However, if we're going to have intelligent and reasonable here, there's no place for vague (and false) generalization on the opposite side of the political 50-yard-line.

There's also no place for

<Squawk!>Lefties always this!<Squawk!>Lefties always that!<

Sure there is. If Ron has a problem with it, Ron can bring it up with directly.

*I* have a problem with it. And I *am* bringing it up with you directly, in case you hadn't noticed.

It's no concern of yours.

ridiculing the opinions or statements of those on *your* opposit I will have to look back on this thread to see what specific generalizations you're referring to. The only thing I noticed wa being a bit of a jerk...again...

Yeah... You should definitely know what you're talking about before criticising others. "Before" being the key word.

I do know what I'm talking about: you being a bit of a jerk...still...

A bit, perhaps. And a little fun. What's it to you?

Opposing sides can have valid opposing views, but mischaracterizing t other side to fit some cartoon image of themselves is not a valid vie and definitely worthy of ridicule.

But mischaracterizing the other side as a parrot is different? You, sir, are worthy of ridicule, too! Yet, for the most part, you are not being ridiculed, despite your own ridiculous ridiculing of others!

If the other side is indeed parroting the same falsehoods over and over like
a parrot, then indeed characterizing them as a parrot is appropriate. I
didn't characterize all conservatives as parrots, did I? Nope, just Ron.

Perhaps you should take good advice and not worry your blessed little heart about who is and isn't a troll.

Thank you for the blessing, but there is nothing about me that can be described as 'little', except the amount of remaining hair on my scalp. Second least of all, my heart. Go ahead, ask which is first least! (o_-)

Well, isn't that special.

Perhaps you should take good advice and lighten the [bleep] up! Smile a little! Don't worry, if it breaks your face, I'll pay for the surgery!
I'm nice that way!

I'm not the one who's uptight, man. If Ron slights "Lefties" then as a
"Leftie" I'm entitled to respond. I have no idea what you're doing in this conversation except wasting bandwidth.

Please continue enjoying your day!

I intend to.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

However, if we're going to have intelligent and reason here, there's no place for vague (and false) generaliz on the opposite side of the political 50-yard-line.

There's also no place for

<Squawk!>Lefties always this!<Squawk!>Lefties always t

Sure there is. If Ron has a problem with it, Ron can bring it up directly.

*I* have a problem with it. And I *am* bringing it up with you direct in case you hadn't noticed.

It's no concern of yours.

Did this stop being a *public* echo recently? If not, it's a concern of *any* concerned participant. I fit that description perfectly.

ridiculing the opinions or statements of those on *your* op I will have to look back on this thread to see what specifi generalizations you're referring to. The only thing I notic being a bit of a jerk...again...

Yeah... You should definitely know what you're talking about bef criticising others. "Before" being the key word.

I do know what I'm talking about: you being a bit of a jerk...still..

A bit, perhaps. And a little fun. What's it to you?

It's not an issue if you wish to have a little fun. It is when you confuse 'fun' with 'jerk'. Again, I was only intending to give you a mostly-friendly reminder to be nice to people. I certainly would be much happier right now,
if we had let it drop there, rather than tossing male bovine feces at each other over a bunch of honestly pointless messages...but, I never start something I'm not willing to finish, so...Lead on, MacDuff! And curs'd be the one who first cries 'Hold! Enough!'

If the other side is indeed parroting the same falsehoods over and over like a parrot, then indeed characterizing them as a parrot is
appropriate. I didn't characterize all conservatives as parrots, did I? Nope, just Ron.

Here's a different point of view, for your consideration. Any time Ron (among others) dares to utter the word 'Leftie', you start doing your parrot impression. It's almost as if you're ridiculing him for his stance, rather
than joining him in debate, which implies that you are unwilling or unable to have the intelligent conversations that you mentioned earlier.

I would remind you that this isn't the first time I've brought this particular 'joke' up. It may or may not have been a factor in my treating you like you treat others, not so long ago...

Perhaps you should take good advice and lighten the [bleep] up! Smile little! Don't worry, if it breaks your face, I'll pay for the surgery I'm nice that way!

I'm not the one who's uptight, man. If Ron slights "Lefties" then as a "Leftie" I'm entitled to respond. I have no idea what you're doing in
this conversation except wasting bandwidth.

I wasn't suggesting that you were uptight, or I would have probably said "loosen" up. However, you are a little heavy-handed in how you respond to people. And, as was already mentioned, you wanted intelligent conversation.
How do you expect to get that while acting like a fool?

As the owner of my bandwidth, I'm entitled to waste it as I see fit. If you don't want to waste yours, stop opening my messages. Or, *gasp* don't be a
jerk so I don't have to do this anymore!

Trust me, I'm not enjoying it anymore than you are. Dealing with delinquent children (of any age) is far more annoying than fun.

I don't know if you've noticed this, but I am becoming less polite as this bickering goes on. I have noticed, and I don't like it. You certainly have a way of bringing out the worst in people.

Please enjoy tomorrow too, damn it! (^_^)

McDoob
SysOp, PiBBS
pibbs.sytes.net

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: PiBBS (1:229/110)

<Squawk!>Lefties always this!<Squawk!>Lefties always that!<Squawk!>

ridiculing the opinions or statements of those on *your* opposite side. I will
have to look back on this thread to see what specific generalizations you're referring to. The only thing I noticed was you, being a bit of a jerk...again...

If you read back, I am sure that you will find that Jeff *never* makes any generalizations about people he perceives as being right-of-center...

I was only trying to give you a (sort of) friendly reminder that...well... trolls are bad, mmkay?

Let me decide who is trolling, thanks! :)


* SLMR 2.1a * Avoid reality at all costs.
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

On 15 Mar 2022, Shaun Buzza said the following...

If the other side is indeed parroting the same falsehoods over and ov like a parrot, then indeed characterizing them as a parrot is appropriate. I didn't characterize all conservatives as parrots, did Nope, just Ron.

Here's a different point of view, for your consideration. Any time Ron (among others) dares to utter the word 'Leftie', you start doing your parrot impression. It's almost as if you're ridiculing him for his
stance, rather than joining him in debate, which implies that you are unwilling or unable to have the intelligent conversations that you mentioned earlier.

I have brought his false generalizations to his attention in the past,
several times. We seem to have reached an arrangement where he continues to make them and I continue to mock them. If he stops making them, I will stop mocking them (as I will then have nothing to mock), but if I stop mocking
them now and then, will he stop making them? Most assuredly not. They're
pretty much his trademark.

I would remind you that this isn't the first time I've brought this particular 'joke' up. It may or may not have been a factor in my
treating you like you treat others, not so long ago...

It is not for you to judge.

I'm not the one who's uptight, man. If Ron slights "Lefties" then as "Leftie" I'm entitled to respond. I have no idea what you're doing in this conversation except wasting bandwidth.

I wasn't suggesting that you were uptight, or I would have probably said "loosen" up. However, you are a little heavy-handed in how you respond to people. And, as was already mentioned, you wanted intelligent conversation. How do you expect to get that while acting like a fool?

That's a fairly loaded question and as such, I refuse to answer. As for my heavy-handedness, it does not come from nowhere; it comes from seeing lie
after lie after lie being spread by the ignorant, ill-informed denizens of
this echo.

As the owner of my bandwidth, I'm entitled to waste it as I see fit. If you don't want to waste yours, stop opening my messages. Or, *gasp*
don't be a jerk so I don't have to do this anymore!

As far as your attempts to moderate my responses, I can assure you that you
are indeed simply wasting bandwidth.

Trust me, I'm not enjoying it anymore than you are. Dealing with delinquent children (of any age) is far more annoying than fun.

If people continue irresponsible, ignorant behavior, then I reserve the right to mock them for doing so. That is beyond your ability to control.

I don't know if you've noticed this, but I am becoming less polite as
this bickering goes on. I have noticed, and I don't like it. You
certainly have a way of bringing out the worst in people.

Perhaps you should stop fixating on me, then? It's a little creepy, actually.

Please enjoy tomorrow too, damn it! (^_^)

I plan to enjoy every day I have, to the best of my ability. With 5 dogs and
a loving partner, it's not difficult. While I was away, I signed up for the America's Test Kitchen website, which has the most amazing recipes. I've also been working on the next iteration of my electronic herb garden, which will have a display unit/alarm separate from the sensor unit. The sensor unit will have light, temperature, humidity, and 8 soil moisture sensors, as well as a camera (one sensor unit per 8 plants). The light, temperature, and soil moisture readings will be monitored via WiFi by the display unit, which will display graphs and photos while idle, but will display warnings in the event that a reading exceeds allowable parameters. It will also send out a tweet
via its own Twitter account describing the problem, and that will cause an alert on my phone.

Does it sound like I'm having any lack of enjoyment in my life?

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

On 15 Mar 2022, Mike Powell said the following...

<Squawk!>Lefties always this!<Squawk!>Lefties always that!<Squawk!>

ridiculing the opinions or statements of those on *your* opposite side. will
have to look back on this thread to see what specific generalizations yo referring to. The only thing I noticed was you, being a bit of a jerk...again...

If you read back, I am sure that you will find that Jeff *never* makes
any generalizations about people he perceives as being right-of-center...

I'm actually very sensitive to that and, much to Aaron's perpetual consternation, tend to use qualifiers like "many," "most," etc.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

<Squawk!>Lefties always this!<Squawk!>Lefties always that!<Squawk!>

ridiculing the opinions or statements of those on *your* opposite side. will
have to look back on this thread to see what specific generalizations yo referring to. The only thing I noticed was you, being a bit of a jerk...again...

If you read back, I am sure that you will find that Jeff *never* makes
any generalizations about people he perceives as being right-of-center...

No, of course not! Not Jeff! (@_@)
(I assume that was sarcasm, yes?)

I was only trying to give you a (sort of) friendly reminder that...well. trolls are bad, mmkay?

Let me decide who is trolling, thanks! :)

For the record, I wasn't accusing anyone of trolling, I was simply saying
it's bad...but, to your point, I really am trying. It's not like I'm being a mirror again...

I will reign it in a bit, sir. (-_-)7

McDoob
SysOp, PiBBS
pibbs.sytes.net

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: PiBBS (1:229/110)

Here's a different point of view, for your consideration. Any time Ro (among others) dares to utter the word 'Leftie', you start doing your parrot impression. It's almost as if you're ridiculing him for his stance, rather than joining him in debate, which implies that you are unwilling or unable to have the intelligent conversations that you mentioned earlier.

I have brought his false generalizations to his attention in the past, several times. We seem to have reached an arrangement where he continues to make them and I continue to mock them. If he stops making them, I
will stop mocking them (as I will then have nothing to mock), but if I stop mocking them now and then, will he stop making them? Most assuredly not. They're pretty much his trademark.

Okay, that's fair. But, along the same vein, if you stop mocking him, I can stop giving you crap about it, as I will then have nothing to complain about.

The only person's actions you control are your own. You cannot stop your opponent from saying things that annoy you any more than I can stop you from saying things that annoy me. However, we both can bring these to the
attention of the annoying person, and ask them to control themselves. And...don't ask me what I think your trademark is. Mike has *just* warned me not to call you that. (o_-)

I would remind you that this isn't the first time I've brought this particular 'joke' up. It may or may not have been a factor in my treating you like you treat others, not so long ago...

It is not for you to judge.

It *is* for me to speak up when I percieve injustice, though, as I am doing
now and have done in the past. I am specifically *not* judging you. If I
were, it's very likely that you would already be a permanent member of my
twit list. However, I am certainly questioning your actions.

I wasn't suggesting that you were uptight, or I would have probably s "loosen" up. However, you are a little heavy-handed in how you respon people. And, as was already mentioned, you wanted intelligent conversation. How do you expect to get that while acting like a fool?

That's a fairly loaded question and as such, I refuse to answer. As for
my heavy-handedness, it does not come from nowhere; it comes from seeing lie after lie after lie being spread by the ignorant, ill-informed denizens of this echo.

Wise refusal, esteemed opponent! (o_-)

I can certainly understand how that could create a lot of frustration and cynicism on your part. However, is that really worth bringing yourself down
to the same level? (o_O)

I want to stress this again. I wasn't objecting to your message, or your
right to send it. I was objecting to the way that message was delivered. There are ways to tell someone he's being a fool without becoming one yourself,
after all.

At the very least, come up with something new. As it stands, you're the only one here that constantly repeats the same phrase, like a parrot would.

As the owner of my bandwidth, I'm entitled to waste it as I see fit. you don't want to waste yours, stop opening my messages. Or, *gasp* don't be a jerk so I don't have to do this anymore!

As far as your attempts to moderate my responses, I can assure you that you are indeed simply wasting bandwidth.

That's my right, as owner of my bandwidth. As it is yours to waste your own
in responding to these attempts. I would again reiterate that I wouldn't feel the need to make such attempts if you were to moderate your responses yourself...

Trust me, I'm not enjoying it anymore than you are. Dealing with delinquent children (of any age) is far more annoying than fun.

If people continue irresponsible, ignorant behavior, then I reserve the right to mock them for doing so. That is beyond your ability to control.

Of course! But it is also beyond yours, how people choose to continue. And I reserve the right to do this all over again, if *you* continue punitive, arrogant behaviour. The circle is complete!

I don't know if you've noticed this, but I am becoming less polite as this bickering goes on. I have noticed, and I don't like it. You certainly have a way of bringing out the worst in people.

Perhaps you should stop fixating on me, then? It's a little creepy, actually.

If you really think that I'm 'fixating on you', then you are far more self-important/narcissistic than I have given you credit for. Trust me, I'd
do the same thing to God Himself, if he started acting like that. I am currently giving you priority, because that is what I believe is necessary,
but 'fixating' I am not. You simply aren't pretty enough, and your boobs
aren't big enough, to get me to fixate. (o_-)

While I was away, I signed up
for the America's Test Kitchen website, which has the most amazing recipes. I've also been working on the next iteration of my electronic herb garden, which will have a display unit/alarm separate from the
sensor unit. The sensor unit will have light, temperature, humidity, and
8 soil moisture sensors, as well as a camera (one sensor unit per 8 plants). The light, temperature, and soil moisture readings will be monitored via WiFi by the display unit, which will display graphs and photos while idle, but will display warnings in the event that a reading exceeds allowable parameters. It will also send out a tweet via its own Twitter account describing the problem, and that will cause an alert on
my phone.

This is a very interesting subject that I would really enjoy discussing with you in an place where it is on-topic. I have a lot of experience with growing plants, given how popular a certain 'medicinal' plant is where I grew up. And
I am curious to know how using technology in that way is affecting
your...grow op...

If you open this discussion in a more appropriate echo, I will be sure to join you there. I'm not sure if there's a 'gardening' echo on Fido, but I know there's one on fsxNet!

Does it sound like I'm having any lack of enjoyment in my life?

Well, yes...but only because you seem to put such effort into sucking the enjoyment out of everyone else's! (o_-)

I wasn't honestly suggesting that you didn't have a full, enjoyable, life. Don't get too defensive, my friend. I was, however, stating that life is even more enjoyable when it isn't tarnished with negativity! (Yes, I know, I could use a little less negativity tarnish myself. I'm not perfect either.)

Once again, enjoy your day! And hug one of your dogs for me! I miss mine...

McDoob
SysOp, PiBBS
pibbs.sytes.net

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: PiBBS (1:229/110)

On 15 Mar 2022, Shaun Buzza said the following...

[...]

Whatever, man. I'm done. You do you and I'll do me.

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

[...]

Whatever, man. I'm done. You do you and I'll do me.

Let's hope that works this time! Thanks for at least hearing me out! \(^_^)

McDoob
SysOp, PiBBS
pibbs.sytes.net

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: PiBBS (1:229/110)

On 03-15-22 16:37, Shaun Buzza <=-
spoke to Jeff Thiele about Re: Russia and Ukraine <=-

Here's a different point of view, for your consideration. Any time Ron (among others) dares to utter the word 'Leftie', you start doing your parrot impression. It's almost as if you're ridiculing him for his
stance, rather than joining him in debate, which implies that you are unwilling or unable to have the intelligent conversations that you mentioned earlier.

What you are not taking into account is that Ron is repeats the same old
lines accusing "lefties" of this or that generic fault. The truth is
that usually those lines apply much more to the alt-Right than to
liberals. In addition, he rarely has discourse with anyone other than
those he perceives to be as conservative as he is, I.E.,he is incapable
of having an intelligent conversation with anyone who is not in his
camp.

Dale Shipp
fido_261_1466 (at) verizon (dot) net
(1:261/1466)


... Shipwrecked in Silver Spring, Maryland. 01:57:44, 16 Mar 2022
___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30

--- Maximus/NT 3.01
* Origin: Owl's Anchor (1:261/1466)

If you read back, I am sure that you will find that Jeff *never* makes any generalizations about people he perceives as being right-of-center...

I'm actually very sensitive to that and, much to Aaron's perpetual consternation, tend to use qualifiers like "many," "most," etc.

Many and most are not far off from the generalizations that Ron makes. I somehow doubt that if Ron said "Many/most lefties are always... "
something, that would stop you from the Ron-as-a-parrot impersonations.

In many cases, it would be more accurate to say "the loudest
righties/lefties do <annoying/bad/horrible thing here>," or "the righties/lefties that are in charge of the government are doing <annoying/ bad/horrible thing here>," or "the righties/lefties that are
bashing/defending Biden/Trump/whoever the loudest are
<annoying/bad/horrible thing here>."

They are the ones most likely to make the news, or (apparently) to post in
FIDO political echos.


* SLMR 2.1a * OOPs, I stepped on a GUI!
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

If you read back, I am sure that you will find that Jeff *never* makes any generalizations about people he perceives as being right-of-center...

No, of course not! Not Jeff! (@_@)
(I assume that was sarcasm, yes?)

If I put the word *never* in asterisks, it usually is sarcasm, yes. :)

I was only trying to give you a (sort of) friendly reminder that...well
trolls are bad, mmkay?

Let me decide who is trolling, thanks! :)

For the record, I wasn't accusing anyone of trolling, I was simply saying it's bad...but, to your point, I really am trying. It's not like I'm being a mirror again...

No you are fine. Trolls are bad, but I don't think either of you have quite got to that level at the moment (although I still have a few messages to
read yet! <grin>).


* SLMR 2.1a * He's a few tiles short of a successful re-entry.
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

I have brought his false generalizations to his attention in the past, several times. We seem to have reached an arrangement where he continues to make them and I continue to mock them. If he stops making them, I will stop mocking them (as I will then have nothing to mock), but if I stop mocking them now and then, will he stop making them? Most assuredly not. They're pretty much his trademark.

Okay, that's fair. But, along the same vein, if you stop mocking him, I can stop giving you crap about it, as I will then have nothing to complain about.

I suspect that if Jeff-T were to stop mocking Ron for generalizing Lefties,
Ron would miss it. Similarly, if Ron were to stop generalizing, Jeff-T
would miss it. So I am not too concerned about it, so long as they don't disrespect each other or devolve into gutter language.


* SLMR 2.1a * Justice delayed is justice denied.
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

On 16 Mar 2022, Mike Powell said the following...

If you read back, I am sure that you will find that Jeff *never* ma any generalizations about people he perceives as being right-of-center...

I'm actually very sensitive to that and, much to Aaron's perpetual consternation, tend to use qualifiers like "many," "most," etc.

Many and most are not far off from the generalizations that Ron makes. I somehow doubt that if Ron said "Many/most lefties are always... " something, that would stop you from the Ron-as-a-parrot impersonations.

They are much different from generalizations if they're true. They also acknowledge that it's not a blanket trait of the group being generalized
about.

In many cases, it would be more accurate to say "the loudest righties/lefties do <annoying/bad/horrible thing here>," or "the righties/lefties that are in charge of the government are doing
<annoying/ bad/horrible thing here>," or "the righties/lefties that are bashing/defending Biden/Trump/whoever the loudest are <annoying/bad/horrible thing here>."

Perhaps. In other circumstances, it might be appropriate to say that the most extreme lefties/righties believe this or that.

They are the ones most likely to make the news, or (apparently) to post
in FIDO political echos.

Not to hear Ron tell it.

Not only that, but as Dale pointed out, the qualities that Ron generalizes about when describing "lefties" often applies just a well to "righties."

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

Mike Powell wrote to SHAUN BUZZA <=-

I suspect that if Jeff-T were to stop mocking Ron for generalizing Lefties, Ron would miss it.

I doubt it. I just ignore Jeff's messages.

Similarly, if Ron were to stop generalizing, Jeff-T would miss it.

Now that's possible. But I don't generalize to get Jeff's goat. I do it so that people can start seeing people like Jeff for what they are.

Once you see their similarities, it becomes easier to spot them and give them the attention they deserve: none.


... Reality is an obstacle to hallucination.
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

--- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/09/29 (Linux/64)
* Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)

Here's a different point of view, for your consideration. Any time Ro (among others) dares to utter the word 'Leftie', you start doing your parrot impression. It's almost as if you're ridiculing him for his stance, rather than joining him in debate, which implies that you are unwilling or unable to have the intelligent conversations that you mentioned earlier.

What you are not taking into account is that Ron is repeats the same old lines accusing "lefties" of this or that generic fault. The truth is
that usually those lines apply much more to the alt-Right than to liberals. In addition, he rarely has discourse with anyone other than those he perceives to be as conservative as he is, I.E.,he is incapable
of having an intelligent conversation with anyone who is not in his
camp.

You may be right. I did mention that I hadn't read the entire conversation
when I decided to offer my two cents. It is quite possible that I am being
too hard on Jeff. But only because I expect more from such an intelligent individual. (Yes, Jeffie, you read that right...(o_-) )

Enjoy your day!

McDoob
SysOp, PiBBS
pibbs.sytes.net

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: PiBBS (1:229/110)

For the record, I wasn't accusing anyone of trolling, I was simply sayin it's bad...but, to your point, I really am trying. It's not like I'm bei mirror again...

No you are fine. Trolls are bad, but I don't think either of you have quite got to that level at the moment (although I still have a few messages to read yet! <grin>).

$#!T!!! Where the Fudge is the <Delete> option? I gotta hide some stuff
*real* fast! \(@_@)/

(o_-)

McDoob
SysOp, PiBBS
pibbs.sytes.net

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: PiBBS (1:229/110)

I suspect that if Jeff-T were to stop mocking Ron for generalizing Lefties, Ron would miss it. Similarly, if Ron were to stop
generalizing, Jeff-T would miss it. So I am not too concerned about it, so long as they don't disrespect each other or devolve into gutter language.

I get your point, sir. However, I only objected because I saw disrespect.
Sure, it wasn't to the point of two monkeys flinging poo at each other, but
it was (IMHO) disrespect of another's opinion, which is something that really bothers me. I will try (harder) not to be the moderator in the future. After all, you're doing a fine job already!

I, too, would miss it, if I didn't have tr---uhm...antagonists...to berate. (o_-)

McDoob
SysOp, PiBBS
pibbs.sytes.net

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: PiBBS (1:229/110)

Many and most are not far off from the generalizations that Ron makes. I
somehow doubt that if Ron said "Many/most lefties are always... " something, that would stop you from the Ron-as-a-parrot impersonations.

They are much different from generalizations if they're true. They also acknowledge that it's not a blanket trait of the group being generalized about.

Ron believes his generalizations are true, just like you believe that yours are.

In many cases, it would be more accurate to say "the loudest righties/lefties do <annoying/bad/horrible thing here>," or "the righties/lefties that are in charge of the government are doing <annoying/ bad/horrible thing here>," or "the righties/lefties that are bashing/defending Biden/Trump/whoever the loudest are <annoying/bad/horrible thing here>."

Perhaps. In other circumstances, it might be appropriate to say that the most extreme lefties/righties believe this or that.

Loudest, most extreme... yes, they both fit.


* SLMR 2.1a * Climbing my family tree was fun, until the nuts appeared.
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
* Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)

On 17 Mar 2022, Mike Powell said the following...

Many and most are not far off from the generalizations that Ron mak I
somehow doubt that if Ron said "Many/most lefties are always... " something, that would stop you from the Ron-as-a-parrot impersonati

They are much different from generalizations if they're true. They also acknowledge that it's not a blanket trait of the group being generalized about.

Ron believes his generalizations are true, just like you believe that yours are.

Belief is one thing; objective facts are quite another. Ron's generalizations are easily disproven, no matter what he "believes."

Jeff.

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Cold War Computing BBS (1:387/26)

Belief is one thing; objective facts are quite another. Ron's generalizations are easily disproven, no matter what he "believes."

Speaking of easily disproven generalizations, how *is* that $10 Pi-based BBS coming along, Jeffie? (o_O)

"If you are going to help your neighbour with the thorn in his eye, first you must remove the log in your own" -The Bible (somewhere)

Sorry, man, but I literally could not resist. I honestly tried...for about
ten seconds...(o_-)

McDoob
SysOp, PiBBS
pibbs.sytes.net

--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: PiBBS (1:229/110)