• conversion between lossless codecs

    From August Abolins@2:221/1.58 to Wilfred van Velzen on Sunday, January 02, 2022 09:57:00
    Hello Wilfred!

    ** On Sunday 02.01.22 - 12:26, you wrote to me:

    We tested recordings with quiet passages, and specific
    recordings that featured super low pipe-organ notes. They
    all seemed to reproduce in FLAC and AppleLossless equally
    well.

    That is to be expected with lossless encodings. The
    surprise would be if they didn't! ;)

    It came at a time when I didn't have a way to play FLAC
    directly for the long-term (I only had VLC). But I read
    somewhere that conversion between lossless codecs was..
    lossless. So, the tests included the comparison of FLAC
    converted to AppleLossless.

    From that, I gained confidence that AppleLossless is quite fine
    for "archiving" certain parts of my collections and had
    assurance that I could always reconstitute a fine physical
    audio CD specimen out of them if required.

    I purchased a 4-CD set of one of the The Band's live
    performances, The Last Waltz, from eBay, for a friend. A bit to
    my shock and horror, the set was missing Disc 4. :/ But a CD
    produced in the FLAC->AppleLossless->CD process saved the day.

    --
    ../|ug

    --- OpenXP 5.0.51
    * Origin: (2:221/1.58)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to August Abolins on Sunday, January 02, 2022 16:37:59
    Hi August,

    On 2022-01-02 09:57:00, you wrote to me:

    From that, I gained confidence that AppleLossless is quite fine
    for "archiving" certain parts of my collections and had
    assurance that I could always reconstitute a fine physical
    audio CD specimen out of them if required.

    For archiving you will have to consider: can it be decoded in 10, 20, 30, ... years. Will there be hardware + software available that can do that.

    AppleLossless probably isn't opensource, Flac is. Apple can go bankrupt, Flac can't! ;)

    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
  • From August Abolins@2:221/1.58 to Wilfred van Velzen on Sunday, January 02, 2022 11:09:00
    Hello Wilfred van Velzen!

    ** On Sunday 02.01.22 - 16:37, Wilfred van Velzen wrote to August Abolins:

    From that, I gained confidence that AppleLossless is
    quite fine for "archiving"...

    For archiving you will have to consider: can it be
    decoded in 10, 20, 30, ... years. Will there be hardware
    + software available that can do that.

    For 10 years, I'm not too worried. For 20, maybe. For 30, I'll
    probably be too old to care. ;) Nobody else needs to own my
    audio treasure except me.


    AppleLossless probably isn't opensource, Flac is. Apple
    can go bankrupt, Flac can't! ;)

    Apple can't render my existing iTunes program inoperative. So,
    I'm fine with that. The iTunes prog only complains about
    access and requires a login only when you click on the "Store"
    button.

    Besides.. I can always transcode the AppleLossless to FLAC
    using something else.
    --
    ../|ug

    --- OpenXP 5.0.51
    * Origin: (2:221/1.58)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to August Abolins on Sunday, January 02, 2022 17:19:03
    Hi August,

    On 2022-01-02 11:09:00, you wrote to me:

    For archiving you will have to consider: can it be
    decoded in 10, 20, 30, ... years. Will there be hardware
    + software available that can do that.

    For 10 years, I'm not too worried. For 20, maybe. For 30, I'll
    probably be too old to care. ;) Nobody else needs to own my
    audio treasure except me.

    Are you sure, it won't be of value in your inheritance to someone? ;)

    AppleLossless probably isn't opensource, Flac is. Apple
    can go bankrupt, Flac can't! ;)

    Apple can't render my existing iTunes program inoperative.

    Are you sure?

    And will your hardware+os the software runs on last as long as the files? Do you have backups?

    Besides.. I can always transcode the AppleLossless to FLAC
    using something else.

    Are you sure that will exist and function properly, after Apple had gone bankrupt? ;)

    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
  • From August Abolins@2:221/1.58 to Wilfred van Velzen on Sunday, January 02, 2022 13:10:00
    Hello Wilfred!

    ** On Sunday 02.01.22 - 17:19, you wrote to me:

    probably be too old to care. ;) Nobody else needs to
    own my audio treasure except me.

    Are you sure, it won't be of value in your inheritance to
    someone? ;)

    Sting was interviewed many years ago and asked a similar
    question. He said, "I'm not leaving anything for my kids.
    They can work hard to build their own damn fortune" ..or
    something along those lines. I doubt that he's changed that
    sentiment. I have a similar attitude.


    Apple can't render my existing iTunes program
    inoperative.

    Are you sure?

    Pretty sure; it works quite fine offline.


    And will your hardware+os the software runs on last as
    long as the files? Do you have backups?

    Not too worried about that. I have at least 2 other XP pcs, and
    two Win7 pcs as alternatives. I haven't really started a FLAC/
    AppleLossless programme yet. I realized that a commited project
    to convert 2000+ CDs would take a while! LOL. And.. I would
    really need some terrabytes of storage that I do not have.
    Sofar, I haven't come across a CD of mine that isn't
    represented on Spotify - so, the urgency to FLAC isn't there.


    Besides.. I can always transcode the AppleLossless to
    FLAC using something else.

    Are you sure that will exist and function properly, after
    Apple had gone bankrupt? ;)

    I don't need iTunes to transcode AppleLossless to something
    else. I've been using AnyCoder and dbPoweramp in that manner.

    I doubt that Apple in particular would ever go bankrupt in my
    remaining lifetime. But there is nothing to say that they
    wouldn't close down the iTunes service for lack of sales.
    However, they are still competing with the likes of Spotify and
    TIDAL.
    --
    ../|ug

    --- OpenXP 5.0.51
    * Origin: (2:221/1.58)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to August Abolins on Sunday, January 02, 2022 22:00:09
    Hi August,

    On 2022-01-02 13:10:00, you wrote to me:

    And will your hardware+os the software runs on last as
    long as the files? Do you have backups?

    Not too worried about that. I have at least 2 other XP pcs, and
    two Win7 pcs as alternatives.

    They will all break down in X years! ;-)


    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
  • From August Abolins@2:221/1.58 to Wilfred van Velzen on Sunday, January 02, 2022 18:59:00
    Hello Wilfred!

    ..I have at least 2 other XP pcs, and
    two Win7 pcs as alternatives.

    They will all break down in X years! ;-)

    You misremember. It's X+6 for 2038. The 2038 issue may indeed
    be a little niggly issue. :(


    --
    ../|ug

    --- OpenXP 5.0.51
    * Origin: (2:221/1.58)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to August Abolins on Monday, January 03, 2022 10:50:44
    Hi August,

    On 2022-01-02 18:59:00, you wrote to me:

    ..I have at least 2 other XP pcs, and
    two Win7 pcs as alternatives.

    They will all break down in X years! ;-)

    You misremember. It's X+6 for 2038. The 2038 issue may indeed
    be a little niggly issue. :(

    X was supposed to be randomish number, not necessarily the roman numeral for 10 ! ;-)

    But indeed 2038 is a real problem for fidonet...

    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
  • From August Abolins@2:221/1.58 to Wilfred van Velzen on Monday, January 03, 2022 11:54:00
    Hello Wilfred van Velzen!

    ** On Monday 03.01.22 - 10:50, Wilfred van Velzen wrote to August Abolins:

    X was supposed to be randomish number, not necessarily
    the roman numeral for 10 ! ;-)

    But indeed 2038 is a real problem for fidonet...

    But, I would think that iTunes (as a local program, acting as a
    player, converter, burner, database) will not necesssarily fail
    to operate if the pc date is rolled back to "20:45:52 on
    Friday, 13 December 1901", will it?

    --
    ../|ug

    --- OpenXP 5.0.51
    * Origin: (2:221/1.58)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to August Abolins on Monday, January 03, 2022 18:03:01
    Hi August,

    On 2022-01-03 11:54:00, you wrote to me:

    X was supposed to be randomish number, not necessarily
    the roman numeral for 10 ! ;-)

    But indeed 2038 is a real problem for fidonet...

    But, I would think that iTunes (as a local program, acting as a
    player, converter, burner, database) will not necesssarily fail
    to operate if the pc date is rolled back to "20:45:52 on
    Friday, 13 December 1901", will it?

    You never know until it happens. ;-)

    But regarding "break down" I was thinking more about your old hardware not surviving another X years...

    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
  • From August Abolins@2:221/1.58 to Wilfred van Velzen on Monday, January 03, 2022 14:06:00
    Hello Wilfred!

    ** On Monday 03.01.22 - 18:03, you wrote to me:

    But regarding "break down" I was thinking more about your
    old hardware not surviving another X years...

    Ah, yes. There's that other niggly thing.

    I was well into my first year of ownership of my shop (now 10
    years as of Jan 12, 2012), when the main office pc that was
    operating as a file server to the network wouldn't boot up one
    morning! It was a Dell. I assumed it was the infamous on/off
    switch issue. Opening the case, and testing the switch contacts
    eliminated that issue. Something on the mobo was most likely
    the issue. It was a bit of a mad scramble to steer the
    fileserver fuction to another DT pc. I didn't have time to
    investigate further electronic causes. But I moved the HDD to
    an external USB case and continued to access the files (or at
    least copy the main ones) that way on yet another pc that was
    connected on the network.

    About a year later, that latter pc (a small compact/slim DT
    model) wouldn't boot up consistently either! (Arghhh! Here we
    go again.) I replaced that one with my Lenovo 3000. So far, so
    good.
    --
    ../|ug

    --- OpenXP 5.0.51
    * Origin: (2:221/1.58)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to August Abolins on Monday, January 03, 2022 21:47:33
    Hi August,

    On 2022-01-03 14:06:00, you wrote to me:

    But regarding "break down" I was thinking more about your
    old hardware not surviving another X years...

    Ah, yes. There's that other niggly thing.

    I was well into my first year of ownership of my shop (now 10
    years as of Jan 12, 2012), when the main office pc that was
    operating as a file server to the network wouldn't boot up one
    morning! It was a Dell. I assumed it was the infamous on/off
    switch issue. Opening the case, and testing the switch contacts
    eliminated that issue. Something on the mobo was most likely
    the issue. It was a bit of a mad scramble to steer the
    fileserver fuction to another DT pc. I didn't have time to
    investigate further electronic causes. But I moved the HDD to
    an external USB case and continued to access the files (or at
    least copy the main ones) that way on yet another pc that was
    connected on the network.

    About a year later, that latter pc (a small compact/slim DT
    model) wouldn't boot up consistently either! (Arghhh! Here we
    go again.) I replaced that one with my Lenovo 3000. So far, so
    good.

    As long as you have backups that are not too old, and which are tested to work... ;)

    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)